New World Order – and quotes

Novus Ordo Mundi – the New World Order – is a frightening conspiracy to impose global dictatorship. This scenario is orchestrated by an extremely powerful and influential group consisting of many of the world’s wealthiest people (notably the Rockefellers), influential political leaders, awry intellectuals, as well as big corporations. These people do not want money (they mostly have more than enough) – they want total control.

The term ‘New World Order’ has been used in different contexts by numerous politicians through the ages. The goal is to create worldwide autocratic government through a combination of political finance, social engineering, mind control, and fear-based propaganda.

Their agenda is to create world government without national and regional boundaries and without democratic checks and balances, subservient to the leaders. The intention is to effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet and to dramatically reduce the world’s population by two-thirds. They intend to make our world their world.

It is thought that increasing surveillance and control in the present day is just the lead up to the total and absolute control which is being planned for.

New World Order Quotes

“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes” – Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli of England, in 1844 “Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of State and corporate power” – Benito Mussolini, 1883-1945, Italian dictator“The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch of a society which originated in England … (and) … believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established.” – Professor of History Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University, in his book “Tragedy and Hope”

“Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it” – Woodrow Wilson

“(The New World Order) cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change its perceptions” – Henry Kissinger, World Affairs Council Press Conference, Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel, April 19th 1994

“David Rockefeller is the most conspicuous representative today of the ruling class, a multinational fraternity of men who shape the global economy and manage the flow of its capital. Rockefeller was born to it and he has made the most of it. But what some critics see as a vast international conspiracy, he considers a circumstance of life and just another day’s work.

… In the world of David Rockefeller it’s hard to tell where business ends and politics begins” – Bill Moyers

“We know in the not too distant future a half dozen corporations are going to control the media. We took this step (merger) to ensure we were one of them” – Time-Warner spokesman “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” – Statement made before the United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Moritz Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. which poured millions into the Russian Revolution through James’ brother Max, banker to the German government.

“All of us will ultimately be judged on the effort we have contributed to building a NEW WORLD ORDER” – Robert Kennedy, former U.S. Attorney-General, 1967 “The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the scenes” – Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court “I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within” – General Douglas MacArthur“For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from it’s original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the government” – President Harry Truman

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centres has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson” – U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt in a letter written Nov. 21st 1933 to Colonel E. Mandell House

“The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation” – Mayor (1918-1925) John F. Hylan of New York. “Fundamental Bible-believing people do not have the right to indoctrinate their children in their religious beliefs because we, the state, are preparing them for the year 2000, when America will be part of a one-world global society and their children will not fit in” – Nebraska State Senator Peter Hoagland, speaking on radio in 1983 “When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of freedom to Americans … and so a lot of people say there’s too much personal freedom. When personal freedom’s being abused, you have to move to limit it. That’s what we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the Housing Projects, about how we’re going to have weapon sweeps and more things like that to try to make the people feel safer in their communities” – President Bill Clinton 3-22-94, MTV’s “Enough is Enough”

“Gun registration is not enough” – Attorney-General Janet Reno – 12-10-93 – Associated Press “Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of private firearms is the goal” – Janet Reno

“If a nation values anything more than freedom, then it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort and security that it values, it will lose that too. Unknown Americans must decide: Are we to be governed by Americans or by an international organization? I, for one, owe no alliegence to the United Nations nor will I give it any. I obey only the U.S. Constitution. You had better think about this issue, for if the U.N. can violate the Sovereignty of Haiti, Iraq and other countries, it can violate ours … The United States may not be the top dog 15 years from now. U.N. security council resolutions, backed by say Chinese soldiers, could be aimed at us” – Charley Reese – Orlando Sentinel

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto-determination practiced in past centuries” – David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991

“From the days of Sparticus, Weishaupt, Karl Marx, Trotski, Belacoon, Rosa Luxenberg and Ema Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognisable role in the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now, at last, this band of extraordinary personalities from the under-world of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire” – Winston Churchill to the London press in 1922. “The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power – Political, Monetary, Intellectual, and Ecclesiastical” – U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater from his 1964 book “No Apologies”

“I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election … It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the United States!” – George W. Malone, U.S. Senator (Nevada), speaking before Congress in 1957

“The invisible Money Power is working to control and enslave mankind. It financed Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Zionism, Socialism. All of these are directed to making the United States a member of a World Government …” – AMERICAN MERCURY MAGAZINE, December 1957, pg. 92

“The Air Force is suffering from pilots who have lost faith in their generals, jet engines that still don’t work after repairs and maintenance depots with ‘little quality or quantity of work being produced’, according to an internal Defence Department memorandum. The draft memo paints a troubling picture of the state of American air power. ‘The sad state of airforce readiness can be blamed on the Clinton Administration, which treats the military as a toy to be deployed for meals-on-wheels-type missions without due onsideration for it’s impact on readiness”, said Robert Maginnis, a retired Army Lieutenent colonel and an analyst at the conservative Family Research Council “The International government of the United Nations, stripped of it’s legal trimming, then, is really the International Government of the United States and the Soviet Union acting in Unison” From the American Jewish Committee’s official magazine “Commentary” of Nov. 1958, Pg. 376

“War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in 20 or 30 years … The Bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clentched fist” – Dimitry Z. Manuilsky in a speech made in 1931 before the Lenin School of Political Warfare. (He became an officer of the U.N. Security Council in 1949)

“We must realise that we cannot co-exist eternally. One of us must go to his grave. We do not want to go to the grave. They do not want to go to the grave, either. So what can be done? We must push them to their grave” – Sewren Bailer, a Polish communist leader, who defected to the west, charged that in April, 1955 Khrushchev said this to a group of Warsaw Communists “We operate here under directives which emulate (sic) from the White House … The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant-making power to alter life in the United States so that we can comfortably be merged with the Soviet Union” – Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation, 1954

“The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day’s sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow” – Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27th 1915

“The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world” – M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)

“If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands” – Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book “International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World” (1931)

“… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people” – H. G. Wells, in his book entitled “The New World Order” (1939)

“The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a ‘League of Nations’ or a ‘Federated Union’ to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the ‘New International Order,’ ‘The New World Order,’ ‘World Union Now,’ ‘World Commonwealth of Nations,’ ‘World Community,’ etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual” – excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)

“In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of ‘justice and peace’” – excerpt from article entitled “New World Order Pledged to Jews” in the New York Times (October 1940)

“If totalitarianism wins this conflict, the world will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves. If democracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in a commonwealth of free peoples, and individuals, wherever found, will be the sovereign units of the new world order” –

The Declaration of the Federation of the World, produced by the Congress on World Federation, adopted by the Legislatures of North Carolina (1941), New Jersey (1942), Pennsylvania (1943), and possibly other states.

“New World Order Needed for Peace: State Sovereignty Must Go, Declares Notre Dame Professor” – title of article in The Tablet (Brooklyn) (March 1942)

“Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles tonight called for the early creation of an international organization of anti-Axis nations to control the world during the period between the armistice at the end of the present war and the setting up of a new world order on a permanent basis” – text of article in the Philadelphia Inquirer (June 1942)

“The statement went on to say that the spiritual teachings of religion must become the foundation for the new world order and that national sovereignty must be subordinate to the higher moral law of God” – American Institute of Judaism, excerpt from article in the New York Times (December 1942)

“There are some plain common-sense considerations applicable to all these attempts at world planning. They can be briefly stated: 1. To talk of blueprints for the future or building a world order is, if properly understood, suggestive, but it is also dangerous. Societies grow far more truly than they are built. A constitution for a new world order is never like a blueprint for a skyscraper” – Norman Thomas, in his book “What Is Our Destiny” (1944)

“He [John Foster Dulles] stated directly to me that he had every reason to believe that the Governor [Thomas E. Dewey of New York] accepts his point of view and that he is personally convinced that this is the policy that he would promote with great vigor if elected. So it is fair to say that on the first round the Sphinx of Albany has established himself as a prima facie champion of a strong and definite new world order” – excerpt from article by Ralph W. Page in the Philadelphia Bulletin (May 1944)

“The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, ‘has not been able – nor can it be able – to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand’ … The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, ‘urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach’” – Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York, in an article entitled “Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order” – New York Times (February 1962)

“The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order” – Richard Nixon, in Foreign Affairs (October 1967)

“He [President Nixon] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building ‘a new world order’” – excerpt from an article in the New York Times (February 1972)

“If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis … In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault” – Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)

“The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species” – Richard A. Falk, in an article entitled “Toward a New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions” in the book “On the Creation of a Just World Order” (1975)

“My country’s history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order” – Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975)

“At the old Inter-American Office in the Commerce Building here in Roosevelt’s time, as Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American Affairs under President Truman, as chief whip with Adlai Stevenson and Tom Finletter at the founding of the United Nations in San Francisco, Nelson Rockefeller was in the forefront of the struggle to establish not only an American system of political and economic security but a new world order” – part of article in the New York Times (November 1975)

“A New World Order” – title of article on commencement address at the University of Pennsylvania by Hubert H. Humphrey, printed in the Pennsylvania Gazette (June 1977)

“Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order” – Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations (December 1988)

“We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet antagonisms” – Brent Scowcroft (August 1990), quoted in the Washington Post (May 1991 “We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt’s and Winston Churchill’s vision for peace for the post-war period” – Richard Gephardt, in the Wall Street Journal (September 1990)

“If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we’ve all worked toward for so long” – President George Bush (January 1991)

“But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush’s mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council” – excerpt from A. M. Rosenthal, in the New York Times (January 1991)

“I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: … At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a ‘new world order’ based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court” – George McGovern, in the New York Times (February 1991)

“How I Learned to Love the New World Order” – article by Sen. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. in the Wall Street Journal (April 1992)

“How to Achieve The New World Order” – title of book excerpt by Henry Kissinger, in Time magazine (March 1994)

“The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth – in Morocco – to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund” – part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in the New York Times (April 1994)

“New World Order: The Rise of the Region-State” – title of article by Kenichi Ohmae, political reform leader in Japan, in the Wall Street Journal (August 1994).

The “new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all” – Nelson Mandela, in the Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994).

The renewal of the nonproliferation treaty was described as important “for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order” – President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, in the New York Times (April 1995) “Alchemy for a New World Order” – article by Stephen John Stedman in Foreign Affairs (May/June 1995)

“We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money” – Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995)

Links and References Field-Marshall Watkins Retrieved from…. “http://wiki.gosurf.tk/index.php?title=The_New_World_Order”

America’s Doom Industry

I do not believe in all of this buying and selling by supposed Christian Authors.

The word of God is liberally available for anyone to read and so I do not go along with or necessarily agree with anything that has been said or reproduced by those who chose to make money out of what is freely available for anyone to have, as it should be.

As an example of the type of scamming that goes on I have decided to reproduce the following article that deals with a so-called American prophecy expert named Hal Lindsay.

By Paul Boyer

What we see in contemporary American mass culture really is that apocalyptic belief has become big business. It's become an industry. It's a subset of the publishing industry. ... And books that become successful literally sell millions of copies. And what we're seeing is a kind of synergistic process where a successful televangelist will publish a book which is successful, which will then spin off into videotapes and movies and sometimes prophecy magazines, and even we have bumper stickers and wristwatches and other kinds of material, all of which reinforce popular belief and interest in Bible prophecy.

Who is Hal Lindsey?
Hal Lindsey is one of the most fascinating figures in the whole history of contemporary prophecy belief. Late 1960s! He's a campus preacher out in southern California. 1970, publishes a book, The Late Great Planet Earth, which is really a popularization of John Darby's system.

Theologically, there's nothing new there. What he does is link it to current events: the Cold War, nuclear war, the Chinese Communist threat, the restoration of Israel. All of these events, he links to specific biblical passages in the classic fashion of prophecy popularizes. And he and his ghost writer write the book in a very almost slang-like, very accessible language. It's not a heavy theological book at all. It's a popular book. And this book just took off and became the all-time non-fiction bestseller of the entire decade of the 1970s, and it represented the point at which publishers began to realize there's tremendous potential in prophecy books. And so many other writers begin to write books in the same popular way, which has an enormously broad appeal.

The significance of Hal Lindsey, I think, is he represents another one of those moments of breakthrough, when interest in Bible prophecy spills out beyond just the ranks of the true believers and becomes a broader cultural phenomenon. And people who had never paid much attention to prophecy at all hear about this book. They pick up the paperback. They see the way Lindsey weaves together current events and finds Biblical passages that seem to foretell those events, and they say, "Wow, this is amazing. There must really be something to this." So Lindsey's a very important transitional figure, I think. ...

Hal Lindsey seems to have had considerable influence not just on the part of the public as a whole, but at some of the highest levels of government. He's a somewhat boastful person, and it's not entirely clear how much to trust all of his stories, but he does tell of giving seminars at the Pentagon, seminars at the National War College, that were crowded, thronged with people. So there does seem to have been in the 1970s a considerable interest in prophetic interpretations, particularly as they related to Russia and the Cold War, at some of the highest levels of government. Go through the 50s, 60s, and 70s, and give a general thought about how popularizers turn to film, TV, paperbacks, and what's happening to the new way of disseminating an apocalyptic message in that time.

Prophecy believers since the time of the Millerite movement, the 1840s, have been extremely skilled at using the latest technologies. And that's been very much true in our own day. It's fascinating to see how this ancient belief system is being spread, really worldwide, by ... all the technologies, from mass paperback books to the Internet, World Wide Web sites, videotapes, even feature length films. The entire apparatus of modern mass culture is accessible to those who are believers and who wish to spread their message. ... It's also interesting to see how the prophecy popularizers view modern technology. On the one hand, they see all of these systems of mass communication preparing the way for the Antichrist. But in the meantime, they're quite ready to use these same technologies themselves, to spread the word of their particular interpretation of Bible prophecy.

Again, Hal Lindsey and The Late Great Planet Earth sort of set the standard for this, because Lindsey proved to be an enormously successful marketer of his product. And The Late Great Planet Earth, published initially by an obscure religious publisher in Michigan, is taken up by a mass market publisher and produced in a mass market format that is sold in supermarkets and airports and so on.

A film is made of The Late Great Planet Earth narrated, actually, by Orson Welles. So it set the pattern of a multimedia phenomenon that we now see with a number of prophecy popularizers today. ...

A perfect example of the mass marketing of prophetic belief is the Left Behind series that is now selling by the millions of copies in modern America. It's by Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins, and it's a series of novels which deal in fictional form with pre-millennial dispensationalist beliefs.

It begins with the Rapture. It deals with a small group of so-called Tribulation Saints that find each other during the period of the Great Tribulation and try to survive the rise of the Antichrist. They're very readable.

They're very well written. And they are being marketed in a very powerful and successful way.

The publisher has a web site. You can comment on the book. The publisher has produced a children's version of four kids going through the Great Tribulation. I understand that a film version is in the works. So the Left Behind phenomenon is a classic example of the way a very ancient belief system has broken through into the mass market of modern America. ... What does the Left Behind series tell us about the way prophecy believers are using the media today?

The Left Behind series of novels by Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins, I think, tells us some very interesting things about the way prophecy belief is being used today in this post Cold War period. For one thing, it deals with contemporary themes: the new communications technologies.

The characters in the novels are all using the Internet and communicating by e-mail, and so it's very up-to-the-minute in terms of the cultural material that's described. And yet it deals with a sort of fictionalized version of a very ancient traditional system of Bible prophecy interpretation: the Rapture, the Great Tribulation, the rise of the Antichrist. The religious themes, the apocalyptic themes of the series are very well known, very well established. But they're combined with these contemporary allusions that give the series a very up-to-the-minute quality. ... Is there a contradiction between these stories both using and featuring today's latest greatest technology (Internet etc.) and being true to the story of the Book of Revelation?

I think there's inevitably a kind of distortion and trivialization of what in some sense is a very profound insight. The apocalyptic world view is one that speaks to the human condition in very profound ways, in terms of the opposition of forces of chaos and order and so on. When it's translated into the world of contemporary mass marketing, contemporary Hollywood film techniques, inevitably, it seems to me, much of the depth, much of the complexity, much of the meaning that it might have for people in terms of encouraging them to really think about the nature of the world that we live in, gets lost, and it simply becomes another product to be consumed and forgotten.

Middle East peace process to move forward in next few weeks says Tony Blair

Tony Blair said yesterday that he expected the Middle East peace process to find "a way forward" in the next few weeks.
In a rare return to Westminster, the former prime minister said the month of June would be "critical" to efforts to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Mr. Blair, now Middle East envoy for the Quartet of the United Nations, United States, European Union and Russia, was giving evidence to the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee.

He claimed success in assisting development in the Palestinian territories since taking up his role in summer 2007, but suggested the recent political situation had been an obstacle.

He expressed hope, however, that the commitment to peace from President Barack Obama, the Israeli government and the Arab world could bear fruit.

"I think the desire at the present time frankly is to see if we can get this going again," he told MPs.

"I think June will be a very critical month in this whole business."

Mr. Blair predicted that Mr. Obama would use a speech in Egypt on Thursday to signal the extent of the new American administration's "serious undertaking" in the Middle East.

He said other discussions were also taking place.

"I think at some point over the next few weeks there will emerge a way forward for this," he said.

"There is a lot of thinking that will be done by the Israeli government internally, by the Arab world, by ourselves as a quartet and the American administration, and I think people want to see is there a positive way forward we can achieve here."

Mr. Blair said peace in Israel and the Palestinian territories help improve stability in the wider region, such as Syria and Lebanon, but also in relation to the current Iranian regime.

"If instead of a dynamic that moves towards conflict you have a dynamic that moves towards peace, it gets harder for anyone, in this case the Iranian leadership, to impose a sense of conflict or inevitability of conflict on the region," he said.

The Middle East peace draft of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas

RAMALLAH - Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas presented a draft proposal on settling the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to the US administration when he met President Barack Obama in Washington, a Palestinian source said Saturday.

“The plan includes timetables and mechanisms for carrying out the deals to push forward the political process,” the source said on condition of anonymity.

Abbas’s proposal was based on the US-backed Road Map peace plan, previous agreements reached between Israel and the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) and the Arab peace initiative, the source added.

Israeli-Palestinian negotiations were resumed in late 2007 following a push by former president George W. Bush but failed to progress.

The Palestinians say the non-stop construction of Jewish settlements in the West Bank, the territory which will make up the largest part of a future Palestinian state, was the main obstacle to the talks.

Abbas, who held his first meeting with Obama in Washington on Thursday, asked for immediate help to stop the Israeli settlement activities in the West Bank, including the so-called natural growth of the settlements.

“He also asked for removing the checkpoints in the West Bank, lifting the blockade on the Gaza Strip and reopening the PNA’s office in East Jerusalem, taking in consideration that these were basic points in the Road Map,” the source said.

Obama told Abbas that he would send his envoy George Mitchell to the region next week to meet Israeli and Palestinian officials and discuss ways of pushing the stalled peace talks forward.

Obama also emphasised the need to create a Palestinian state alongside Israel as the best solution, reiterating his administration’s commitment to achieving this goal, the official said.

Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said Obama’s statements generated more optimism for the PNA.

“The Palestinians and the Americans have a common interest in securing a fair and lasting peace in the Middle East,” Erekat added, stressing that the Palestinian statehood must be “viable”.

“Time is running out and the two-state solution must be applied, ” he added.

Meanwhile, Islamic Hamas movement, bitter rival of Abbas, said the meeting between Abbas and Obama was disappointing and did not bring any new thing.

Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum said his movement saw Abbas’s commitment to the Road Map as “an uprooting of the resistance and a liquidation of Hamas” as the plan calls on the PNA to dismantle armed Palestinian groups.

“All the Palestinian factions rejected the Road Map except Abbas,” Barhoum said, adding that Obama’s statements were “insufficient wishes that are no longer useful under the Zionists’ increasing military escalation”.

Hamas wants Abbas to halt peace negotiations with Israel, and to adopt armed resistance against Israel to pressurise the Jewish state into giving the Palestinians their legitimate rights back.

Abbas, however, insists on pursuing peace talks with Israel until finding a fair and just peaceful solution to the conflict and establishing an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.

A Swine Flu Pandemic?

WASHINGTON – If the Mexico swine flu becomes a global pandemic, the routines and comforts of daily life would vanish in the blink of an eye. Small towns and big cities alike would go into a protective crouch.

The worst case scenario, according to U.S. government planners: Two million dead. Hospitals overwhelmed. Schools closed. Swaths of empty seats at baseball stadiums and houses of worship. An economic recovery snuffed out.

We're nowhere close to that. But government leaders at all levels, and major employers, have spent nearly four years planning for the worst in a series of exercises. Their reports, as well as interviews with policymakers, paint a grim picture of what could happen if the swine flu gets severely out of control.

A full-scale pandemic — like the 1918 Spanish flu — would sicken 90 million Americans, or about 30 percent of the population. It could claim the lives of about 2 percent of those infected, about 2 million people, according to government experts.

To put that in perspective, the regular flu causes about 30,000 deaths each year.

"This may or may not be the killer flu," said Kim Elliott, deputy director of the Trust for America's Health, and independent public health group. "But it certainly does seem to have that potential, because it's a novel virus."

A pandemic moves with explosive speed and comes in successive waves. That's why planners start with the worst case.

If a pandemic strikes, the government estimates that nearly 10 million patients would have to be admitted to the hospital, and nearly 1.5 million would need intensive care. About 750,000 would need the help of mechanical ventilators to keep breathing.

No one would be immune from the consequences, even those who don't get sick, according to worst-case exercises run by local and national agencies.

Schools would be closed to try to block the spread of illness, for example, but school buses might be used to take flu victims to alternative clinics rather than overcrowded hospitals.

A 2006 report on the Washington region found both Maryland and Virginia would run out of hospital beds within two weeks of a moderate outbreak.

People who got sick would be isolated, and their relatives could be quarantined.

But even if families weren't required to stay home, many would do so to take care of sick relatives, or because they were afraid of getting sick themselves.

Hotels, restaurants and airlines would face loss of business as business travel and meetings would be replaced by teleconferences.

In the cities, commuters who do go to work might drive, bike or walk instead of using mass transit. On the subway, people would be asked to wear protective masks.

Movie buffs would avoid theaters and rent DVDs instead.

In 1918, authorities even called on churches to cancel services, to the chagrin of some pastors.
As entire societies turn inwardly, the global economy would take a direct hit.

Trust for America's Health estimated in 2007 that a severe pandemic would shrink U.S. output by about 5.5 percent.

"It could be a real blow to any type of recovery," said Elliott. "The whole idea of a just-in-time economy means we depend on each other globally."

But wait a minute. Catch your breath.

Even if the new swine flu from Mexico turns out to be especially aggressive, the worst consequences could be averted.

The nation has made strides in stockpiling antiviral medicines, speeding the production of vaccines and laying down basic public health guidelines.

The government got serious about worst-case planning during the 2005 bird flu scare, as the lessons of Hurricane Katrina loomed large.

"We have a playbook that was developed and is being followed," said Michael Leavitt, who as secretary of Health and Human Services oversaw pandemic planning for President George W. Bush. "It's a substantially better picture than what we faced three years ago."

There are gaps. Some states have not stockpiled their full allocation of antiviral medicines, critical in treating and preventing diseases during the early stages of a pandemic, before a vaccine has been developed.

And Elliott said the federal government has not fulfilled some elements of its own plan, such as purchasing preventive doses of antivirals that would be reserved for medical personnel and first responders. So far, antiviral medicines are proving effective against the Mexico flu.

Dr. Jeff Runge, former chief medical officer for Homeland Security, said it's clearly not a pandemic yet, but it's too early to tell. The next week or two will be critical.

Runge seemed confident. "We've come a long ways since we've been doing this pandemic flu planning," he said. End of quote

Already there has been a great deal written about the so-called Swine Flu, and I for one do not really know how this whole scenario is going to pan out.

Nonetheless, there still remains something incredibly suspect about this swine flu epidemic, and by the looks of things what has begun as a minor epidemic may develop into a pandemic?

However has anyone ever noticed that it seems to be affecting only a certain group of people and small children?

I am a conspiracy theorist but I certainly did not believe in the pre-tribulation theory of the rapture, up until this point that is, but it looks to me as if this may be a deliberately manufactured laboratory virus designed to rid the world of Christians.

Now I know how wild and fanciful that may seem but if you are a genuine Christian my advice to you would be to be very, very careful of the Swine Flu lest you meet with your premature demise.

Remember this the world is right on the verge of seeing the Antichrist come to power as the president of the EU after which he will confirm the treaty of Daniel chapter 9 Verse 27.

From the KJV: And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate. And then a planned Third World War will begin

From the Cutting Edge Ministries website

Quote: Fear has begun to spread globally after North Korea's nuclear test, her missile test, and her threat to begin a war!

What was the Illuminati Plan? "THE SCRIPT HAS NOW BEEN WRITTEN"

"A hair-raising nuclear confrontation in Korea may, towards the end of the period, threaten man's very survival." (Peter Lemesurier, "The Armageddon Script", p. 223 End of quote

Will the Great Pyramid of Giza be capped soon?

These are the two symbols on the back of the American dollar note. They were designed by Freemasons and contains a mass of occultist symbolism that the profane (none-Masons and non-Christians) would not, nor could not understand.

Additionally, the following article has been resourced from the Omega Times, and had been written sometime ago by the late Barry R Smith.

Please note: For the complete picture on the great pyramid of Giza please refer to the reverse of the American dollar note, and the Barry R Smith article reproduced below.

The whole point in once again reproducing the article here is to draw attention to the fact of the Antichrist achieving his power base of the full time EU presidency in early 2010, and of the possibility of the Great Pyramid of Giza being capped with the eye of Satan at exactly the same time.

The upshot is at the time of the writing of this article is that the Great Pyramid of Giza had not as yet been capped with the eye of Satan, but that it may be by the end of, and at the beginning of next year once the Antichrist comes to power as the full time president of the Revised Roman Empire.

Furthermore, there may be a possibility that when the Antichrist does achieve his power base very early next year -- there may be a very strong probability that the actual ceremony may be held in the Great King’s Chamber of the pyramid?

As a consequence, the cap may be set in place on atop the pyramid at the same time, indicating that Satan’s main man is in power -- and that Satan has finally gained complete control of the globe?

This is of course will take place a very shortly time into the interim future, and at this stage all that we are able to do is to hypothesis to if this event will even actually take place, and when it does take place…

Although in reformatting the article I have made a few slight variations, the information remains basically the same, and is still applicable to today's newsworthy items relative to world events in the light of Bible prophecy, so now read on…

Quote: Barry R Smith, There have been many, many theories surrounding the origin, and the purposes of the ancient Pyramids of Egypt... Examples of these theories range from astronomic observatories, to places of cult worship. Extraterrestrial-related theories have also been put forward, with very little scientific evidence to support such claims.

Despite all of the claims, and books written on the subject over the centuries, the ancient pyramids of Egypt still remain one of the seven wonders of the world, with no real logical, efficient, conclusion drawn as to just how they were constructed, and by whom.

In spite of the gobbledygook surrounding the pyramids, the largest of the group, Giza, was designed by God, and built by persons unknown who had long ago left the area.

It was not designed, nor built, by the ancients of Egypt to entomb their deceased pharaohs so that they could pass on safely to the afterlife.

However, Giza was copied by the ancients, possibly utilizing the same method of construction as the largest of the group, to entomb the dead pharaohs. The resulting smaller pyramids were the burial places of the departed kings of queens of ancient Egypt.

The principal pyramid of the group was, and is, a Bible in stone that could not have possibly have been designed by anyone else other than the Supreme Being and creator of the universe - almighty God.

If a horizontal and vertical line were drawn directly through the centre of the great pyramid, the land mass in each quarter would equate to exactly the same measurement. Therefore, the great pyramid (Giza) is exactly in the centre of the earth.

There are exactly 144 stones used in its construction of the pyramid, and the height of the pyramid equates exactly to the total distance around the edifice.

The stones have been so accurately carved and fit together so well that it is impossible to fit even a ten cent piece between each block.

One of the major player’s behind the setting up of a Global New World Order, the Freemasons, have for centuries, held a fascination with pyramids, and in particular the Great Pyramid of Giza.

The dollar note contains two symbols: the one on the left represents the great pyramid of Giza, whilst the seal on the right represents not an American eagle -- but a phoenix.

When God destroyed the Tower of Babel, the phoenix was the mystical bird that arose out of the ashes, and today symbolizes the New World Order.

The great pyramid of Giza has long been a pagan type of temple for Satan worship. Aleister Crowley, Freemason and Chief Satanist of the 20th Century performed a satanic ritual in its Kings Chamber.

The Masonic leader also founded and controlled cults of the Jehovah's Witnesses. Mormons have also adored the Great Pyramid.

The Latin words on the seal of the dollar bill say 'Annuit Coeptis'. Translated this means 'Announcing the Birth Of' and 'Novus Ordo Seclorum' means New World Order'! Therefore, the Latin on the note interpreted says 'Announcing the birth of the New World Order'. The date in roman numerals on the seals is 1776. 1776 is the year the modern day Illuminati were formed. 1776 is also the year of American independence. The Latin 'E Pluribus Unum' is interpreted as 'One out of many' and is the foundation of the New World Order's plan to unify the world's governments, religions, and money systems into a single unified system of a One World Government and in doing so, control the whole globe and her people.

The capstone has not been placed atop the Pyramid. Therefore, the plan for a complete global takeover of all governments, religions, and money systems has not been completed.

Only when the New World Order has been fully established, and the world leader (the Antichrist) has been enthroned will the plan will be complete. Please see my introduction above. RJM

The Dexter wing on the phoenix has thirty two feathers. That number corresponds precisely with the ordinary degrees of Scottish Rite Freemasonry. The sinister wing has thirty-three feathers. The additional feather corresponds to the Thirty-Third Degree of the Scottish rite conferred on those that have alleged to have performed outstanding service in Freemasonry. There are nine tail feathers on the bird. Nine is the number of degrees in the Chapter, Council, and Commander of the York Rite of Freemasonry. Note well: the stars above the head of the phoenix form a hexagram. A hexagram is one of the most evil of all the witchcraft symbols.

Manly Palmer Hall was a member of the Illuminati, and 33rd Degree Freemason and called "the 20th century's greatest Masonic scholar and philosopher" by the Supreme Council of the 33rd Degree of Freemasonry's official monthly publication, the Scottish Rite Journal in the obituary section of August 1990.

The secret Teachings of All Ages is called Manly P. Hall's Magnum Opus and is an Encyclopedic Outline of Masonic, Hermetic, Qabbalistic, and Rosicrucian Symbolical Philosophy. Manly also instructs the reader to bring a human sacrifice to Lucifer each year, which is pure Satanism.

In his book Manly states:
"European mysticism was not dead at the time the United States of America was founded. The hand of the mysteries controlled in the establishment of the new government for the signature of the mysteries may still be seen on the Great Seal of the United States of America. Careful analysis of the seal discloses a mass of occult and Masonic symbols chief among them, the so-called American eagle. ... The American eagle upon the Great Seal is but a conventionalized phoenix..."

"Not only were many of the founders of the United States government Masons, but they received aid from a secret and august body existing in Europe which helped them to establish this country for A PECULIAR AND PARTICULAR PURPOSE known only to the initiated few." (Manly P. Hall, the Secret Teachings of All Ages, pp. XC and XCI)

The European group Manly is referring to is also known as the Illuminati. The Illuminati founded America for a purpose known only to a few high up ranking Freemasons. End of quote.

Government lies to a blind Christianity

By Brian Hay
Posted www.omegatimes.com
February 2009
Internet censorship technology 'flawed' Dec 24, 2008. Stephen Conroy has distanced the Rudd government from a "flawed" internet censorship technology. The federal government has distanced itself from a report that found internet censorship technology under consideration is seriously flawed. Communications Minister Stephen Conroy says the Internet Industry Association (IIA) report was commissioned and paid for by the former Howard government.

It was "not an analysis of the ALP's policy", he said. The report concluded schemes to block inappropriate content - such as child pornography - could slow the internet and result in over- and under-blocking of material. Senator Conroy denied Labor was trialing the technology in spite of the report's negative findings.

"The government is aware of technical concerns raised in the report, and that is why we are conducting a pilot, to put these claims to the test," Senator Conroy said in a statement. “The live pilot trial will provide evidence on the real world impacts of content filtering, including for providers and internet users."It will provide an invaluable opportunity for internet service providers to inform the government's approach." The trial is due to begin in mid-January.

The above part of an article reveals the government agencies attempt at controlling internet access. Here again we can guarantee the Christian crazies who trust all, and believe all then accept all, will stand up against our God given principles of freedom. Because they tell us we must not judge nor question and they will spew out their familiar foolish objection - if I have done nothing wrong, I have nothing to fear argument. That stupid and insane mentality does not even deserve an answer. The scripture demands of us that we become watchers over our cities and societies. It instructs us to stand guard over those who can not speak nor protect themselves and be watchmen on their behalf.

"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banners openly. But the traitor move amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared."

Readers know that one of my main gripes is concerning how Christian conservatives "Religious Right" are hoodwinked (by the way that term is derived from Freemasonry, it is one of their oaths of initiation to make men swear an oath of silence never to divulge or reveal their agenda). The church is very much influenced by freemasons who have infiltrated the church and thus generated this attitude of acceptance to all things.

They have so affected their people and in turn churches, so insidiously that now most churchgoers think it acceptable to be a Freemason and a Christian at the same time. That is anathema, a heretical teaching and unacceptable truth. It is impossible to be a genuine godly Christian and take the oaths of freemasonry.

Christians today do not even read their Bible, let alone live by it. Most squawk out these modern false contemporary church philosophies which are nothing but regurgitated hedonist and atheistic new age thinking. I have said for many years now and have also suffered under the stupidity of these humanistic people in that they refuse to accept that people who claim Christianity as their dogma could be anything other than Christian.

Take the idiocy of ones who heard Tony Blair, ex British Prime Minister and George Bush out going president of the USA and John Howard ex Prime Minister of Australia, and there are others, who said that “the God of Christianity is the same God as the God of Islam”.

That is not, can not and will not ever be true and those who say it, as well as those who then accept it, do not know the true person of Jesus Christ as the scripture portrays Him. They simply do not know the truth.

Jesus is the only way, there is no other way and to believe that there is another way is to deny the truth of the Bible. Revelation tells us that those who claim these things and deny the truth will have their part in the lake of fire - they are the unbelieving also. So the point I make is this, the three men mentioned above early in their role as leaders all claimed to be born again believers. And the religious world went wild with excitement. No one would allow any one else to question their faith (and I was personally attacked over this very issue many times in each of these countries by their so called Christian leaders for even suggesting it).

Yet these three constantly reiterated the above claim that Christ and Allah were the same. This is heresy and must be repudiated and refuted.

But it does not take a genius to follow closely the speeches, the quotations and the public addresses of these (and other) political leaders to realize very quickly these imposters are not Christian at all, not by any stretch of the imagination. They are however charlatans and antichrists, leading men astray. Yet not content with that, they act the part so well they become heretical authorities and teachers to the weak and spineless believers who worship the very ground upon which they walk, suggesting their knowledge and interpretation of truth is right simply because they are civil authoritarians. Well Caesar and Hitler tried all that, it is nothing new and it does not mean they have the truth. Yet foolish saints believe them.

I am not sure why it is that people do not want to hear nor face the truth, but it is a fact they do not. They will overlook blatant displays of character deficiency and outbursts of obscenity and also allow the apostasy of these they espouse to impact their lives even to the detriment of their own souls. How and why, I am at a loss to understand this. John Howard lied so many times when in leadership it changed his image from being known as honest John to when he left office as dishonest John. Bush was so accustomed to lying and deceit he could not lie straight in bed and was known as the most foul mouthed man in the white house. I have video captions of his outrageous behavior that would not be acceptable in any asylum.

Then there is Blair, he also had to get out before he was pushed out because of untruth and deceit. That is not even scratching the surface of the scandals each of them was associated with at the end of their respective terms. But all of that is overlooked because they all said they were committed Christians. Well check out their positions now. Bush for instance is now neither recorded as saying on ABC’s Nightline that he does not believe the Bible is accurate nor is it the true word of God etc etc. He believes in evolution and that the Bible is a book of good stories. Read the articles for yourself. For some, I guess that will never happen as we do not want to hear or admit the truth any more.

So what of us in the near future? I personally do not believe we have one now as a result of this negligence and insanity on our part. Time alone will tell who is right. Read this article from an American preacher and judge for yourselves.

The all-time classic illustration of this foible is the way the Religious Right was (and is) so enamored with President George W. Bush. No matter what Bush did: no matter how egregiously unconstitutional, no matter how utterly stupid, no matter how blatantly evil his actions were, Christian conservatives (almost universally) either robotically accepted and approved what he did, or blindly looked the other way. It was maddening!

It was as if Christian conservatives lost all ability to reason; it was as if they lost all discernment and discretion. Because George W. Bush claimed to be a Christian, and because he was a Republican, he could do no wrong. To this very day, the only group of people who yet approves of Bush's Presidency is the Religious Right. Everyone else on the planet realizes that George W. Bush's Presidency will go down in history as one of the all-time worst.

Bush took a robust economy to a second Great Depression, took a free republic to a Police State, pushed executive power; trampled individual liberty; made a mockery of justice; and made America the laughingstock of the world. No matter. The Religious Right still love him. Why? Because he is a "Christian”. Since 2000, James Dobson and Pensacola Christian College (PCC), have had a love fest with George W. Bush. Life-size cardboard posters of Bush have stood in their bookstores. Bush ranks somewhere between Moses and the Almighty. And nothing Bush said or did seem to matter. I said all of that to call attention to a recent interview Cynthia McFadden had with President Bush on ABC's Nightline. During the interview, McFadden asked Bush if the Bible was literally true. Now, acceptance of the Bible's literalness is one of conservative Christianity's most sacred doctrines. There is not a professor at PCC (or any other conservative Christian college) that would keep his or her job, if he or she questioned the veracity of the Scriptures. Most conservative Christians would even go so far as to say that one cannot be a born-again Christian who does not believe that the Bible is the infallible Word of God. Well, what was George Bush's response to McFadden's question? He said, "You know. Probably not. . . . No, I'm not a literalist." Notice, Bush twice denied the veracity of the Scriptures. Now, Bush has no reason to "fudge" his answers, right? He has no more elections to face. No more, "He's got to say this to get elected," which was the flippant explanation given by the Religious Right to excuse Bush's numerous apostate positions during the past eight years.

So, George W. Bush clearly stated that he does not believe the Bible is God's Holy, inspired Word. Will Dobson and PCC still say that Bush is "one of us"? Bush told McFadden, "It is hard for me to justify or prove the mystery of the Almighty in my life. All I can just tell you is that I got back into religion and I quit drinking shortly thereafter . . . ." What kind of Christian testimony is this: "I got back into religion"? I doubt that this kind of testimony would grant membership in the Campus Church. Bush's statements will not diminish his god-like status with James Dobson and the rest of the Religious Right in America. For eight years, Christian conservatives have been selling their convictions, doctrines, and even their consciences to George W. Bush. I will even go so far as to say that, in many respects, millions of Christians have turned President Bush into an idol. Of course, none of this would have happened had Christians--and especially Christian pastors--not lost touch with truth. Will any rebuke their "Christian" Apostate President? No. When will Christians and pastors open their Bibles and history books? Will they admit the possibility of having been duped? All that seems to matter is that he or she professes to be a Christian, and frankly, this last election proved that even a Christian profession is not necessary.

Money Manipulations and Madness

By Brian Hay
Posted www.omegatimes.com
February 2009
With the advent of the recent stupidity on Wall St and its subsequent effect on the banking fraternity we can only stand back in absolute awe at the public’s totally false and misleading perception of how it works and what sustains it. I for one have been warning and grandstanding for many years now (but very much unheard and to a large extent ridiculed) concerning the deceptive and contrived manner of our capitalist banking practices and their associated legal quagmire put in place to hide and protect their every devious moves. I have been called communistic socialistic anti God and every other expletive as well, but no one has given me an alternative expose of what I know the truth to be. All these critics do is suggest I am uninformed or extreme in my viewpoint or alternatively call me a crank. But here we are and now all the chickens are coming home to roost and my detractors are running for cover to try and protect what little depleting wealth they have left. Little do they realize we have seen nothing yet compared to what is coming.

Barry Smith and others for many years were trying to warn the people, especially the church and the saints, that such a time as this was coming and coming with great propensity. Here we are and guess what? The foolish blinded church has and will be caught more severely than the unchurched because the Christian community does not have the ruthless resolve needed to deal with such foreboding ominous decisions taking place at present. The Banking cartel is a very elite and small group of German Jewish neoconservative individuals, whose self proclaimed mandate is to own and control the entire planet and all its wealth and resources including every man woman and child alive. They have had plans afoot for many generations now to totally and finally implement a system which would control and dictate their terms to every individual on earth. Their God, as the scripture states, is their belly - in other words they want it all. They want to consume everything and everyone according to their personal ideals, exploiting all others for their own evil intent.

What most folk do not realize is that they have been putting in place the legislation over many centuries now that will enhance their degenerate totalitarian schemes and as a result we, the public, now have absolutely no power over our own future as they have become so powerful we can no longer stop them. All we can do now is pray that God will intervene and hasten His coming as the Epistle of Peter instructs us to do and try and get the message of salvation out to as many as we can while we have time. I am saddened that we now have no option but to accept our lot and await the coming one to deliver us from this evil. I do not have all the answers but I certainly have a book and a Saviour that does have all the answers and it is He who will guide and direct my thoughts and actions in these days if I let Him and the same goes for us all. He will show us what we are to do when these ills come upon us, but you must be alert to them in order to be ably directed through them as they unfold. If you are not aware of the signs you will not be looking for them so you must get into His Word the Bible. Jesus instructed us so clearly that these times would come and that when they arrived we were to be alert and watching that these things would not come upon us and catch us unawares. I am at a loss to know why it is that God fearing folk and preachers alike refuse to acknowledge that these things maybe JUST MAYBE the actual signs and events Jesus foretold us of.

What we are seeing in the financial arena is the final melt down of all the systems that we have been used to in commerce, so that they can integrate all systems together as one and then implement a totalitarian control over every individual on earth. All the legislation has been passed into and through the international judiciary, allowing the legal and justifiable laws of every sovereign nation on earth to be brought under this unilateral system - all commerce and industry, along with all trusts and foundations so that they can no longer operate outside the jurisdiction of international law. And all this has been done right under our very noses but no one seems to care. Each week new legislation is introduced building upon the old making it more and more difficult to operate a business in any degree of privacy or independence. It is all done to sound so good and beneficial to us but it is actually becoming more and more controlling and dictatorial. Just take for example the issue of terrorism. We are constantly told to be on guard, which literally suggests we trust no one. We must inevitably spy on one another and report on one another, monitoring even our own parents and loved ones, even children, because their behaviour may even be inappropriate. We are told and instructed daily now to be watching neighbors’ and reporting them to police if we see any thing suspicious.

As each new fraudulent operator of big business is exposed, after which they do their deals and they seem to walk free, we innocent end up not only paying their debts but suffer the imposition of more and more intolerable policing of the laws because of their dishonorable actions. What we do not realize is that each exposure of fraud is actually an opportunity for the authorities to implement their police state and as such much of the dishonesty does not come from the small man or the public, but from the big men at the top. The list goes on - politicians, lawyers, judges, police chiefs, government officials, departmental heads, and the like. Why is this? Simply, it creates the very opportunity for them to strengthen and implement their police state totalitarianism. So they welcome the crime in many cases as it affords them the very situation in which they can operate their life long plans. If you were to uncover the actual sources of it, you would probably find it is actually organized crime at the highest level.

Pedophilia is a classic example it is not so much the little man in the street that is behind all this sadistic practice, it is your top judges, your top lawyers and politicians, public officials and wealthy elite, as well as the unreal world of media personalities whose sense of values is so warped and distorted they are considered by most to be just plain weird. That is where ego’s are stroked and preened and money buys anything itwants.

Everyday someone in this nation is charged and fingered in crime and sick compromising actions that make the average mans hair curl. But we have become so accustomed to it now we don’t even bat an eyelid. We have become desensitized by the continual vile soap opera and series on TV and we seem to enjoy it all the more the more sadistic it becomes. The more vile television is, the more suggestive it becomes and the more bizarre and sinister its reality shows become the more we lap it up.

What do you think God thinks of it all? Do you not think He grieves over what He sees and what He hears? I tell you when God calls it a day and says enough imagine how men’s blood will cry out from the ground on which it has been spilt. The number of innocent lives cut short because of some greedy individual wanting assets and some one else’s chattels, or some depraved individual wanting sexual gratification to satisfy his own twisted pleasure or some deviate seeking to exploit someone else so as to benefit himself. What a race we have become - we are worse than animals, they do not even treat their kind like we do. No wonder the Bible tells us God will have to step in to mans’ affairs and cut them short because we would destroy everything of value if we had enough time and opportunity.