By Brian HayPosted www.omegatimes.com
February 2009
Internet censorship technology 'flawed' Dec 24, 2008. Stephen Conroy has distanced the Rudd government from a "flawed" internet censorship technology. The federal government has distanced itself from a report that found internet censorship technology under consideration is seriously flawed. Communications Minister Stephen Conroy says the Internet Industry Association (IIA) report was commissioned and paid for by the former Howard government.
It was "not an analysis of the ALP's policy", he said. The report concluded schemes to block inappropriate content - such as child pornography - could slow the internet and result in over- and under-blocking of material. Senator Conroy denied Labor was trialing the technology in spite of the report's negative findings.
"The government is aware of technical concerns raised in the report, and that is why we are conducting a pilot, to put these claims to the test," Senator Conroy said in a statement. “The live pilot trial will provide evidence on the real world impacts of content filtering, including for providers and internet users."It will provide an invaluable opportunity for internet service providers to inform the government's approach." The trial is due to begin in mid-January.
The above part of an article reveals the government agencies attempt at controlling internet access. Here again we can guarantee the Christian crazies who trust all, and believe all then accept all, will stand up against our God given principles of freedom. Because they tell us we must not judge nor question and they will spew out their familiar foolish objection - if I have done nothing wrong, I have nothing to fear argument. That stupid and insane mentality does not even deserve an answer. The scripture demands of us that we become watchers over our cities and societies. It instructs us to stand guard over those who can not speak nor protect themselves and be watchmen on their behalf.
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banners openly. But the traitor move amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared."
Readers know that one of my main gripes is concerning how Christian conservatives "Religious Right" are hoodwinked (by the way that term is derived from Freemasonry, it is one of their oaths of initiation to make men swear an oath of silence never to divulge or reveal their agenda). The church is very much influenced by freemasons who have infiltrated the church and thus generated this attitude of acceptance to all things.
They have so affected their people and in turn churches, so insidiously that now most churchgoers think it acceptable to be a Freemason and a Christian at the same time. That is anathema, a heretical teaching and unacceptable truth. It is impossible to be a genuine godly Christian and take the oaths of freemasonry.
Christians today do not even read their Bible, let alone live by it. Most squawk out these modern false contemporary church philosophies which are nothing but regurgitated hedonist and atheistic new age thinking. I have said for many years now and have also suffered under the stupidity of these humanistic people in that they refuse to accept that people who claim Christianity as their dogma could be anything other than Christian.
Take the idiocy of ones who heard Tony Blair, ex British Prime Minister and George Bush out going president of the USA and John Howard ex Prime Minister of Australia, and there are others, who said that “the God of Christianity is the same God as the God of Islam”.
That is not, can not and will not ever be true and those who say it, as well as those who then accept it, do not know the true person of Jesus Christ as the scripture portrays Him. They simply do not know the truth.
Jesus is the only way, there is no other way and to believe that there is another way is to deny the truth of the Bible. Revelation tells us that those who claim these things and deny the truth will have their part in the lake of fire - they are the unbelieving also. So the point I make is this, the three men mentioned above early in their role as leaders all claimed to be born again believers. And the religious world went wild with excitement. No one would allow any one else to question their faith (and I was personally attacked over this very issue many times in each of these countries by their so called Christian leaders for even suggesting it).
Yet these three constantly reiterated the above claim that Christ and Allah were the same. This is heresy and must be repudiated and refuted.
But it does not take a genius to follow closely the speeches, the quotations and the public addresses of these (and other) political leaders to realize very quickly these imposters are not Christian at all, not by any stretch of the imagination. They are however charlatans and antichrists, leading men astray. Yet not content with that, they act the part so well they become heretical authorities and teachers to the weak and spineless believers who worship the very ground upon which they walk, suggesting their knowledge and interpretation of truth is right simply because they are civil authoritarians. Well Caesar and Hitler tried all that, it is nothing new and it does not mean they have the truth. Yet foolish saints believe them.
I am not sure why it is that people do not want to hear nor face the truth, but it is a fact they do not. They will overlook blatant displays of character deficiency and outbursts of obscenity and also allow the apostasy of these they espouse to impact their lives even to the detriment of their own souls. How and why, I am at a loss to understand this. John Howard lied so many times when in leadership it changed his image from being known as honest John to when he left office as dishonest John. Bush was so accustomed to lying and deceit he could not lie straight in bed and was known as the most foul mouthed man in the white house. I have video captions of his outrageous behavior that would not be acceptable in any asylum.
Then there is Blair, he also had to get out before he was pushed out because of untruth and deceit. That is not even scratching the surface of the scandals each of them was associated with at the end of their respective terms. But all of that is overlooked because they all said they were committed Christians. Well check out their positions now. Bush for instance is now neither recorded as saying on ABC’s Nightline that he does not believe the Bible is accurate nor is it the true word of God etc etc. He believes in evolution and that the Bible is a book of good stories. Read the articles for yourself. For some, I guess that will never happen as we do not want to hear or admit the truth any more.
So what of us in the near future? I personally do not believe we have one now as a result of this negligence and insanity on our part. Time alone will tell who is right. Read this article from an American preacher and judge for yourselves.
The all-time classic illustration of this foible is the way the Religious Right was (and is) so enamored with President George W. Bush. No matter what Bush did: no matter how egregiously unconstitutional, no matter how utterly stupid, no matter how blatantly evil his actions were, Christian conservatives (almost universally) either robotically accepted and approved what he did, or blindly looked the other way. It was maddening!
It was as if Christian conservatives lost all ability to reason; it was as if they lost all discernment and discretion. Because George W. Bush claimed to be a Christian, and because he was a Republican, he could do no wrong. To this very day, the only group of people who yet approves of Bush's Presidency is the Religious Right. Everyone else on the planet realizes that George W. Bush's Presidency will go down in history as one of the all-time worst.
Bush took a robust economy to a second Great Depression, took a free republic to a Police State, pushed executive power; trampled individual liberty; made a mockery of justice; and made America the laughingstock of the world. No matter. The Religious Right still love him. Why? Because he is a "Christian”. Since 2000, James Dobson and Pensacola Christian College (PCC), have had a love fest with George W. Bush. Life-size cardboard posters of Bush have stood in their bookstores. Bush ranks somewhere between Moses and the Almighty. And nothing Bush said or did seem to matter. I said all of that to call attention to a recent interview Cynthia McFadden had with President Bush on ABC's Nightline. During the interview, McFadden asked Bush if the Bible was literally true. Now, acceptance of the Bible's literalness is one of conservative Christianity's most sacred doctrines. There is not a professor at PCC (or any other conservative Christian college) that would keep his or her job, if he or she questioned the veracity of the Scriptures. Most conservative Christians would even go so far as to say that one cannot be a born-again Christian who does not believe that the Bible is the infallible Word of God. Well, what was George Bush's response to McFadden's question? He said, "You know. Probably not. . . . No, I'm not a literalist." Notice, Bush twice denied the veracity of the Scriptures. Now, Bush has no reason to "fudge" his answers, right? He has no more elections to face. No more, "He's got to say this to get elected," which was the flippant explanation given by the Religious Right to excuse Bush's numerous apostate positions during the past eight years.
So, George W. Bush clearly stated that he does not believe the Bible is God's Holy, inspired Word. Will Dobson and PCC still say that Bush is "one of us"? Bush told McFadden, "It is hard for me to justify or prove the mystery of the Almighty in my life. All I can just tell you is that I got back into religion and I quit drinking shortly thereafter . . . ." What kind of Christian testimony is this: "I got back into religion"? I doubt that this kind of testimony would grant membership in the Campus Church. Bush's statements will not diminish his god-like status with James Dobson and the rest of the Religious Right in America. For eight years, Christian conservatives have been selling their convictions, doctrines, and even their consciences to George W. Bush. I will even go so far as to say that, in many respects, millions of Christians have turned President Bush into an idol. Of course, none of this would have happened had Christians--and especially Christian pastors--not lost touch with truth. Will any rebuke their "Christian" Apostate President? No. When will Christians and pastors open their Bibles and history books? Will they admit the possibility of having been duped? All that seems to matter is that he or she professes to be a Christian, and frankly, this last election proved that even a Christian profession is not necessary.
No comments:
Post a Comment