Novus Ordo Mundi – the New World Order – is a frightening conspiracy to impose global dictatorship. This scenario is orchestrated by an extremely powerful and influential group consisting of many of the world’s wealthiest people (notably the Rockefellers), influential political leaders, awry intellectuals, as well as big corporations. These people do not want money (they mostly have more than enough) – they want total control.The term ‘New World Order’ has been used in different contexts by numerous politicians through the ages. The goal is to create worldwide autocratic government through a combination of political finance, social engineering, mind control, and fear-based propaganda.
Their agenda is to create world government without national and regional boundaries and without democratic checks and balances, subservient to the leaders. The intention is to effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet and to dramatically reduce the world’s population by two-thirds. They intend to make our world their world.
It is thought that increasing surveillance and control in the present day is just the lead up to the total and absolute control which is being planned for.
New World Order Quotes
It is thought that increasing surveillance and control in the present day is just the lead up to the total and absolute control which is being planned for.
New World Order Quotes
“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes” – Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli of England, in 1844 “Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of State and corporate power” – Benito Mussolini, 1883-1945, Italian dictator“The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch of a society which originated in England … (and) … believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established.” – Professor of History Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University, in his book “Tragedy and Hope”
“Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it” – Woodrow Wilson
“(The New World Order) cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change its perceptions” – Henry Kissinger, World Affairs Council Press Conference, Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel, April 19th 1994
“David Rockefeller is the most conspicuous representative today of the ruling class, a multinational fraternity of men who shape the global economy and manage the flow of its capital. Rockefeller was born to it and he has made the most of it. But what some critics see as a vast international conspiracy, he considers a circumstance of life and just another day’s work.
… In the world of David Rockefeller it’s hard to tell where business ends and politics begins” – Bill Moyers
“We know in the not too distant future a half dozen corporations are going to control the media. We took this step (merger) to ensure we were one of them” – Time-Warner spokesman “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” – Statement made before the United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Moritz Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. which poured millions into the Russian Revolution through James’ brother Max, banker to the German government.
“All of us will ultimately be judged on the effort we have contributed to building a NEW WORLD ORDER” – Robert Kennedy, former U.S. Attorney-General, 1967 “The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the scenes” – Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court “I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within” – General Douglas MacArthur“For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from it’s original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the government” – President Harry Truman
“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centres has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson” – U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt in a letter written Nov. 21st 1933 to Colonel E. Mandell House
“The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation” – Mayor (1918-1925) John F. Hylan of New York. “Fundamental Bible-believing people do not have the right to indoctrinate their children in their religious beliefs because we, the state, are preparing them for the year 2000, when America will be part of a one-world global society and their children will not fit in” – Nebraska State Senator Peter Hoagland, speaking on radio in 1983 “When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of freedom to Americans … and so a lot of people say there’s too much personal freedom. When personal freedom’s being abused, you have to move to limit it. That’s what we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the Housing Projects, about how we’re going to have weapon sweeps and more things like that to try to make the people feel safer in their communities” – President Bill Clinton 3-22-94, MTV’s “Enough is Enough”
“Gun registration is not enough” – Attorney-General Janet Reno – 12-10-93 – Associated Press “Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of private firearms is the goal” – Janet Reno
“If a nation values anything more than freedom, then it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort and security that it values, it will lose that too. Unknown Americans must decide: Are we to be governed by Americans or by an international organization? I, for one, owe no alliegence to the United Nations nor will I give it any. I obey only the U.S. Constitution. You had better think about this issue, for if the U.N. can violate the Sovereignty of Haiti, Iraq and other countries, it can violate ours … The United States may not be the top dog 15 years from now. U.N. security council resolutions, backed by say Chinese soldiers, could be aimed at us” – Charley Reese – Orlando Sentinel
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto-determination practiced in past centuries” – David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991
“From the days of Sparticus, Weishaupt, Karl Marx, Trotski, Belacoon, Rosa Luxenberg and Ema Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognisable role in the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now, at last, this band of extraordinary personalities from the under-world of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire” – Winston Churchill to the London press in 1922. “The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power – Political, Monetary, Intellectual, and Ecclesiastical” – U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater from his 1964 book “No Apologies”
“I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election … It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the United States!” – George W. Malone, U.S. Senator (Nevada), speaking before Congress in 1957
“The invisible Money Power is working to control and enslave mankind. It financed Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Zionism, Socialism. All of these are directed to making the United States a member of a World Government …” – AMERICAN MERCURY MAGAZINE, December 1957, pg. 92
“The Air Force is suffering from pilots who have lost faith in their generals, jet engines that still don’t work after repairs and maintenance depots with ‘little quality or quantity of work being produced’, according to an internal Defence Department memorandum. The draft memo paints a troubling picture of the state of American air power. ‘The sad state of airforce readiness can be blamed on the Clinton Administration, which treats the military as a toy to be deployed for meals-on-wheels-type missions without due onsideration for it’s impact on readiness”, said Robert Maginnis, a retired Army Lieutenent colonel and an analyst at the conservative Family Research Council “The International government of the United Nations, stripped of it’s legal trimming, then, is really the International Government of the United States and the Soviet Union acting in Unison” From the American Jewish Committee’s official magazine “Commentary” of Nov. 1958, Pg. 376
“War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in 20 or 30 years … The Bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clentched fist” – Dimitry Z. Manuilsky in a speech made in 1931 before the Lenin School of Political Warfare. (He became an officer of the U.N. Security Council in 1949)
“We must realise that we cannot co-exist eternally. One of us must go to his grave. We do not want to go to the grave. They do not want to go to the grave, either. So what can be done? We must push them to their grave” – Sewren Bailer, a Polish communist leader, who defected to the west, charged that in April, 1955 Khrushchev said this to a group of Warsaw Communists “We operate here under directives which emulate (sic) from the White House … The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant-making power to alter life in the United States so that we can comfortably be merged with the Soviet Union” – Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation, 1954
“The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day’s sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow” – Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27th 1915
“The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world” – M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)
“If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands” – Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book “International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World” (1931)
“… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people” – H. G. Wells, in his book entitled “The New World Order” (1939)
“The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a ‘League of Nations’ or a ‘Federated Union’ to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the ‘New International Order,’ ‘The New World Order,’ ‘World Union Now,’ ‘World Commonwealth of Nations,’ ‘World Community,’ etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual” – excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)
“In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of ‘justice and peace’” – excerpt from article entitled “New World Order Pledged to Jews” in the New York Times (October 1940)
“If totalitarianism wins this conflict, the world will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves. If democracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in a commonwealth of free peoples, and individuals, wherever found, will be the sovereign units of the new world order” –
The Declaration of the Federation of the World, produced by the Congress on World Federation, adopted by the Legislatures of North Carolina (1941), New Jersey (1942), Pennsylvania (1943), and possibly other states.
“New World Order Needed for Peace: State Sovereignty Must Go, Declares Notre Dame Professor” – title of article in The Tablet (Brooklyn) (March 1942)
“Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles tonight called for the early creation of an international organization of anti-Axis nations to control the world during the period between the armistice at the end of the present war and the setting up of a new world order on a permanent basis” – text of article in the Philadelphia Inquirer (June 1942)
“The statement went on to say that the spiritual teachings of religion must become the foundation for the new world order and that national sovereignty must be subordinate to the higher moral law of God” – American Institute of Judaism, excerpt from article in the New York Times (December 1942)
“There are some plain common-sense considerations applicable to all these attempts at world planning. They can be briefly stated: 1. To talk of blueprints for the future or building a world order is, if properly understood, suggestive, but it is also dangerous. Societies grow far more truly than they are built. A constitution for a new world order is never like a blueprint for a skyscraper” – Norman Thomas, in his book “What Is Our Destiny” (1944)
“He [John Foster Dulles] stated directly to me that he had every reason to believe that the Governor [Thomas E. Dewey of New York] accepts his point of view and that he is personally convinced that this is the policy that he would promote with great vigor if elected. So it is fair to say that on the first round the Sphinx of Albany has established himself as a prima facie champion of a strong and definite new world order” – excerpt from article by Ralph W. Page in the Philadelphia Bulletin (May 1944)
“The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, ‘has not been able – nor can it be able – to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand’ … The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, ‘urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach’” – Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York, in an article entitled “Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order” – New York Times (February 1962)
“The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order” – Richard Nixon, in Foreign Affairs (October 1967)
“He [President Nixon] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building ‘a new world order’” – excerpt from an article in the New York Times (February 1972)
“If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis … In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault” – Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)
“The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species” – Richard A. Falk, in an article entitled “Toward a New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions” in the book “On the Creation of a Just World Order” (1975)
“My country’s history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order” – Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975)
“At the old Inter-American Office in the Commerce Building here in Roosevelt’s time, as Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American Affairs under President Truman, as chief whip with Adlai Stevenson and Tom Finletter at the founding of the United Nations in San Francisco, Nelson Rockefeller was in the forefront of the struggle to establish not only an American system of political and economic security but a new world order” – part of article in the New York Times (November 1975)
“A New World Order” – title of article on commencement address at the University of Pennsylvania by Hubert H. Humphrey, printed in the Pennsylvania Gazette (June 1977)
“Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it” – Woodrow Wilson
“(The New World Order) cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change its perceptions” – Henry Kissinger, World Affairs Council Press Conference, Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel, April 19th 1994
“David Rockefeller is the most conspicuous representative today of the ruling class, a multinational fraternity of men who shape the global economy and manage the flow of its capital. Rockefeller was born to it and he has made the most of it. But what some critics see as a vast international conspiracy, he considers a circumstance of life and just another day’s work.
… In the world of David Rockefeller it’s hard to tell where business ends and politics begins” – Bill Moyers
“We know in the not too distant future a half dozen corporations are going to control the media. We took this step (merger) to ensure we were one of them” – Time-Warner spokesman “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” – Statement made before the United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Moritz Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. which poured millions into the Russian Revolution through James’ brother Max, banker to the German government.
“All of us will ultimately be judged on the effort we have contributed to building a NEW WORLD ORDER” – Robert Kennedy, former U.S. Attorney-General, 1967 “The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the scenes” – Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court “I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within” – General Douglas MacArthur“For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from it’s original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the government” – President Harry Truman
“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centres has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson” – U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt in a letter written Nov. 21st 1933 to Colonel E. Mandell House
“The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation” – Mayor (1918-1925) John F. Hylan of New York. “Fundamental Bible-believing people do not have the right to indoctrinate their children in their religious beliefs because we, the state, are preparing them for the year 2000, when America will be part of a one-world global society and their children will not fit in” – Nebraska State Senator Peter Hoagland, speaking on radio in 1983 “When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of freedom to Americans … and so a lot of people say there’s too much personal freedom. When personal freedom’s being abused, you have to move to limit it. That’s what we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the Housing Projects, about how we’re going to have weapon sweeps and more things like that to try to make the people feel safer in their communities” – President Bill Clinton 3-22-94, MTV’s “Enough is Enough”
“Gun registration is not enough” – Attorney-General Janet Reno – 12-10-93 – Associated Press “Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of private firearms is the goal” – Janet Reno
“If a nation values anything more than freedom, then it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort and security that it values, it will lose that too. Unknown Americans must decide: Are we to be governed by Americans or by an international organization? I, for one, owe no alliegence to the United Nations nor will I give it any. I obey only the U.S. Constitution. You had better think about this issue, for if the U.N. can violate the Sovereignty of Haiti, Iraq and other countries, it can violate ours … The United States may not be the top dog 15 years from now. U.N. security council resolutions, backed by say Chinese soldiers, could be aimed at us” – Charley Reese – Orlando Sentinel
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto-determination practiced in past centuries” – David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991
“From the days of Sparticus, Weishaupt, Karl Marx, Trotski, Belacoon, Rosa Luxenberg and Ema Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognisable role in the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now, at last, this band of extraordinary personalities from the under-world of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire” – Winston Churchill to the London press in 1922. “The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power – Political, Monetary, Intellectual, and Ecclesiastical” – U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater from his 1964 book “No Apologies”
“I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election … It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the United States!” – George W. Malone, U.S. Senator (Nevada), speaking before Congress in 1957
“The invisible Money Power is working to control and enslave mankind. It financed Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Zionism, Socialism. All of these are directed to making the United States a member of a World Government …” – AMERICAN MERCURY MAGAZINE, December 1957, pg. 92
“The Air Force is suffering from pilots who have lost faith in their generals, jet engines that still don’t work after repairs and maintenance depots with ‘little quality or quantity of work being produced’, according to an internal Defence Department memorandum. The draft memo paints a troubling picture of the state of American air power. ‘The sad state of airforce readiness can be blamed on the Clinton Administration, which treats the military as a toy to be deployed for meals-on-wheels-type missions without due onsideration for it’s impact on readiness”, said Robert Maginnis, a retired Army Lieutenent colonel and an analyst at the conservative Family Research Council “The International government of the United Nations, stripped of it’s legal trimming, then, is really the International Government of the United States and the Soviet Union acting in Unison” From the American Jewish Committee’s official magazine “Commentary” of Nov. 1958, Pg. 376
“War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in 20 or 30 years … The Bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clentched fist” – Dimitry Z. Manuilsky in a speech made in 1931 before the Lenin School of Political Warfare. (He became an officer of the U.N. Security Council in 1949)
“We must realise that we cannot co-exist eternally. One of us must go to his grave. We do not want to go to the grave. They do not want to go to the grave, either. So what can be done? We must push them to their grave” – Sewren Bailer, a Polish communist leader, who defected to the west, charged that in April, 1955 Khrushchev said this to a group of Warsaw Communists “We operate here under directives which emulate (sic) from the White House … The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant-making power to alter life in the United States so that we can comfortably be merged with the Soviet Union” – Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation, 1954
“The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day’s sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow” – Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27th 1915
“The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world” – M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)
“If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands” – Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book “International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World” (1931)
“… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people” – H. G. Wells, in his book entitled “The New World Order” (1939)
“The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a ‘League of Nations’ or a ‘Federated Union’ to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the ‘New International Order,’ ‘The New World Order,’ ‘World Union Now,’ ‘World Commonwealth of Nations,’ ‘World Community,’ etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual” – excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)
“In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of ‘justice and peace’” – excerpt from article entitled “New World Order Pledged to Jews” in the New York Times (October 1940)
“If totalitarianism wins this conflict, the world will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves. If democracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in a commonwealth of free peoples, and individuals, wherever found, will be the sovereign units of the new world order” –
The Declaration of the Federation of the World, produced by the Congress on World Federation, adopted by the Legislatures of North Carolina (1941), New Jersey (1942), Pennsylvania (1943), and possibly other states.
“New World Order Needed for Peace: State Sovereignty Must Go, Declares Notre Dame Professor” – title of article in The Tablet (Brooklyn) (March 1942)
“Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles tonight called for the early creation of an international organization of anti-Axis nations to control the world during the period between the armistice at the end of the present war and the setting up of a new world order on a permanent basis” – text of article in the Philadelphia Inquirer (June 1942)
“The statement went on to say that the spiritual teachings of religion must become the foundation for the new world order and that national sovereignty must be subordinate to the higher moral law of God” – American Institute of Judaism, excerpt from article in the New York Times (December 1942)
“There are some plain common-sense considerations applicable to all these attempts at world planning. They can be briefly stated: 1. To talk of blueprints for the future or building a world order is, if properly understood, suggestive, but it is also dangerous. Societies grow far more truly than they are built. A constitution for a new world order is never like a blueprint for a skyscraper” – Norman Thomas, in his book “What Is Our Destiny” (1944)
“He [John Foster Dulles] stated directly to me that he had every reason to believe that the Governor [Thomas E. Dewey of New York] accepts his point of view and that he is personally convinced that this is the policy that he would promote with great vigor if elected. So it is fair to say that on the first round the Sphinx of Albany has established himself as a prima facie champion of a strong and definite new world order” – excerpt from article by Ralph W. Page in the Philadelphia Bulletin (May 1944)
“The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, ‘has not been able – nor can it be able – to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand’ … The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, ‘urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach’” – Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York, in an article entitled “Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order” – New York Times (February 1962)
“The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order” – Richard Nixon, in Foreign Affairs (October 1967)
“He [President Nixon] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building ‘a new world order’” – excerpt from an article in the New York Times (February 1972)
“If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis … In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault” – Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)
“The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species” – Richard A. Falk, in an article entitled “Toward a New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions” in the book “On the Creation of a Just World Order” (1975)
“My country’s history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order” – Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975)
“At the old Inter-American Office in the Commerce Building here in Roosevelt’s time, as Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American Affairs under President Truman, as chief whip with Adlai Stevenson and Tom Finletter at the founding of the United Nations in San Francisco, Nelson Rockefeller was in the forefront of the struggle to establish not only an American system of political and economic security but a new world order” – part of article in the New York Times (November 1975)
“A New World Order” – title of article on commencement address at the University of Pennsylvania by Hubert H. Humphrey, printed in the Pennsylvania Gazette (June 1977)
“Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order” – Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations (December 1988)
“We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet antagonisms” – Brent Scowcroft (August 1990), quoted in the Washington Post (May 1991 “We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt’s and Winston Churchill’s vision for peace for the post-war period” – Richard Gephardt, in the Wall Street Journal (September 1990)
“If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we’ve all worked toward for so long” – President George Bush (January 1991)
“But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush’s mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council” – excerpt from A. M. Rosenthal, in the New York Times (January 1991)
“I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: … At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a ‘new world order’ based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court” – George McGovern, in the New York Times (February 1991)
“How I Learned to Love the New World Order” – article by Sen. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. in the Wall Street Journal (April 1992)
“How to Achieve The New World Order” – title of book excerpt by Henry Kissinger, in Time magazine (March 1994)
“The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth – in Morocco – to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund” – part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in the New York Times (April 1994)
“New World Order: The Rise of the Region-State” – title of article by Kenichi Ohmae, political reform leader in Japan, in the Wall Street Journal (August 1994).
The “new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all” – Nelson Mandela, in the Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994).
The renewal of the nonproliferation treaty was described as important “for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order” – President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, in the New York Times (April 1995) “Alchemy for a New World Order” – article by Stephen John Stedman in Foreign Affairs (May/June 1995)
“We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money” – Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995)
“We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet antagonisms” – Brent Scowcroft (August 1990), quoted in the Washington Post (May 1991 “We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt’s and Winston Churchill’s vision for peace for the post-war period” – Richard Gephardt, in the Wall Street Journal (September 1990)
“If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we’ve all worked toward for so long” – President George Bush (January 1991)
“But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush’s mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council” – excerpt from A. M. Rosenthal, in the New York Times (January 1991)
“I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: … At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a ‘new world order’ based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court” – George McGovern, in the New York Times (February 1991)
“How I Learned to Love the New World Order” – article by Sen. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. in the Wall Street Journal (April 1992)
“How to Achieve The New World Order” – title of book excerpt by Henry Kissinger, in Time magazine (March 1994)
“The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth – in Morocco – to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund” – part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in the New York Times (April 1994)
“New World Order: The Rise of the Region-State” – title of article by Kenichi Ohmae, political reform leader in Japan, in the Wall Street Journal (August 1994).
The “new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all” – Nelson Mandela, in the Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994).
The renewal of the nonproliferation treaty was described as important “for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order” – President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, in the New York Times (April 1995) “Alchemy for a New World Order” – article by Stephen John Stedman in Foreign Affairs (May/June 1995)
“We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money” – Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995)
Links and References Field-Marshall Watkins Retrieved from…. “http://wiki.gosurf.tk/index.php?title=The_New_World_Order”
