Hot off the presses I have the latest, and may I say the maddest, idea yet to come from those the planners behind a World Government. This is real New World Order agenda type of paraphernalia that has clearly been very clearly designed to gain the greatest control over, not just those living and working in Australia, but everyone right around the globe.If you read the following article then you will know what I am referring to when I say the maddest idea yet, because that's what we are being confronted with here in this latest effort to gain total control over every aspect of the lives of every Australian, and eventually everyone right around the world from the cradle to the grave.
If you thought that the Mark of the Beast was total control, then what they are suggesting here is right up with that form of dictatorship, but only worse if that could at all be possible, with the plan being to ration our food with the obvious implications being that if we do not do as we are told then we will not be fed?
This plan has the more than obvious connotations of being specifically designed so that once the Antichrist gets a hold of it he will be able to have everyone where he wants them, right under his thumb so that he will be able to charge whatever he likes for the food.
Remember what Henry Kissinger said - if you control the energy then you control the nations and if you control the food then you control the individuals of those nations?
Right now there are plans afoot to introduce a carbon tax over here is Australia so that is sure to double the price of basic household utilities within a very short period of time, and now with this latest idea of a green ration card (which of course will later on be transferred over to the microchip implant) they almost have the general populace right where they want them, completely screwed, if you pardon the expression?
There is no doubt that this has been mentioned in the Bible thousands of years ago when we were told in the book of Revelations that the Antichrist will ride a Black Horse as he sets about to gain total control of the food, and then dishes it out to those that he wants to live, and in turn denies it to those that he wants to starve to death.
The Third Seal: The Black Horse
5 When He opened the third seal, I heard the third living creature say, "Come and see." So I looked, and behold, a black horse, and he who sat on it had a pair of scales in his hand.
6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four living creatures saying, "A quart of wheat for a denarius, and three quarts of barley for a denarius; and do not harm the oil and the wine."
Revelation 6:5-6 Third Seal Following the Red horse, we see a black horse this event follows the chronological order of events taking place on earth. Following a nuclear war, several events take place, one is nuclear fallout and destruction of edible foods. Nuclear was does not only hurt living humans, but everything living. Food and food supplies are destroyed in the process of nuclear war as the radioactive waves pass through all living matter. This is then followed by the particles which then begin to a fall on fields where food is growing to feed the populations.
Black horse The third horse pictured is a black horse, which is used to depict famine elsewhere in scripture. (Jeremiah 4:28, Lamentations 4;8-9). Following the war, food will be in short supply on the planet and many will die.
Scales This is the picture of commerce in the world. Today, the idol of the earth is no longer socialist doctrines but capitalism and success without God. Many in the former Communist nations no longer look to Communism as their hope but the success and prosperity of Capitalism. Nations on the earth are pushing commerce and success as the hope of their nations. Godless capitalism, is a growing movement in the world today.
The hope of success for the most part is a godless and corrupt hope, which pushes sex without marriage, homosexuality, violence, murder and host of other sins. Many of these same countries reluctantly accept Christian missionaries and evangelism as an appeasement for free trade. The Gospel however continues to give people a choice, what really is important.
In the tribulation period, people will be forced to choose the God of Heaven or humanity.
Quart of wheat The Greek word used here, coi'nix Choinix, is the amount of food a laboring man would eat in one meal. Wheat was is a higher quality food then barley. The cost of wheat was one days wages, or a denarius. Following the wars of the Red horse, the lack of food will cause world wide inflation resulting in famine.
The voice is coming from the center of the Throne, from the midst of the four living creatures. This could very well be the voice of Christ, reminding those who live on the Earth through Revelation chapter 6, that earthly food and commerce is not humanities hope but God’s word alone. This is the message in John chapter 6, as Christ explains the concept of eternal life versus the temporary life in this world.
33 "For the bread of God is He who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world." 34 Then they said to Him, "Lord, give us this bread always." 35 And Jesus said to them, "I am the bread of life. He who comes to Me shall never hunger, and he who believes in Me shall never thirst. John 6:33-35
Denarius An amount equivalent to what a day laborer would make. (Matthew 20:2) A full day of labor was required to have enough to eat for one day.
Three quarts barley This was a lower quality food then wheat. Barley, was food for animals and the poor. Here the same denarius will purchase 3 meals of barley versus one meal of wheat.
Oil and the wine These were foods of luxury and wealth. These items are contrasted to the wheat and barley, which require a whole days labor. The wealthy will not suffer like those who will need food to get by on a daily basis.
Now read the following article to see what I am referring to when I say that the Australian people are being psychologically prepared for the time of the Black Horse of Revelation
Quote: Norfolk Island green ration is ludicrous
SO you think I exaggerate when I say global warming is just the latest cause of the closet totalitarian?
Then pay close attention to an experiment the warmists are about to inflict on the people of Norfolk Island.
Be warned. What's being trialled there with $390,000 of Gillard Government money may, if it works, be spread to the mainland, say the researchers.
Which means it's coming for you.
The plan - and, no, I'm not joking - is to put Norfolk Islanders on rations to fight both global warming and obesity.
Funded by the Australian Research Council, and approved by the Socialist Left Science Minister Kim Carr, researchers from the Southern Cross University will give each volunteer on the island a "carbon card".
Every time they buy petrol, electricity or an air flight, they will have "carbon units" deducted from the fixed allowance on their card.
More units will be lost each time they buy fatty foods, or produce flown in from a long way away.
If, at the end of each year or so, they have carbon units left over, they can sell them. If they've blown their allocation, they must buy more.
But each year, the number of carbon units in this market will be cut, causing their price to soar - and thus the price of extra food, power and petrol to rise - because the idea is to cut greenhouse gases and make Norfolk Islanders trim, taut and terrifically moral.
Conservatives well aware of human fallibility will immediately spot the obvious flaw in this latest scheme of the Left to remake humanity.
It's this: what happens when people run out of their carbon rations, and can't afford the extra units they need to buy more fuel, power or even food?
This is precisely what I put this week to Garry Egger, head of this experiment and professor of Lifestyle Medicine and Applied Health Promotion at SCU.
His response was astonishing and revealing, because this basic question - which so exposes the teeth of the totalitarian - would have been one you'd think he'd long wrestled with.
After all, his personal carbon trading idea is not new, so much does it appeal to the fingerwaggers and bullies infesting the global warming faith.
As far back as 2006, Britain's then environmental minister, David Miliband, proposed a similar scheme, since endorsed by the Environment Agency and House of Commons
Environmental Audit Committee, which even insisted the Government defy howls of protest from mere voters.
"Widespread public acceptance, while desirable, should not be a pre-condition for a personal carbon trading scheme; the need to reduce emissions is simply too urgent," the MPs said, before being driven off to dinner.
(Or as our own Professor Clive Hamilton, author and former Greens candidate, puts it, global warming is so "horrible" that leaders must look to "canvassing of emergency responses such as the suspension of democratic processes".)
Nor is Egger's idea new in Australia, The farcical "ideas summit" of prime minister Kevin Rudd's 1000 "best and brightest" Australians also recommended it - which is a very good reason to be alert and alarmed.
"We have the technology now to create a 'carbon account' for individuals," says the summit's report, in between appeals for chairbound workers to be given 30 minutes a day of exercise and stairs to climb at work.
Yet although carbon rationing plans have been kicked around for years by the Left, that key question of the conservative has still not been answered. As in: what if people don't want to live your dream? What if they rebel, or merely fail you?
Let's go to the transcript of my interview with Egger on MTR 1377 this week, to see how he answered.
Me: What happens to those people who overdraw their carbon emissions ...
Egger: In the first year you are just warned ... (Later) if you overspend, you've got to buy the units that are cashed in ...
Me: If you put this in on the mainland and you were really strict about it - you really thought the world was warming very, very dangerously and someone exceeded their rations of these carbon units - one would presume that you would make food, for example, too expensive for them to buy.
Egger: That's right ... so if you've got, for example, a very fatty unhealthy food that is imported from overseas which takes a lot of carbon to develop it, then the price would go up ...
Me: What happens to a very fat family, a very irresponsibly fat family, and they've blown their carbon budget to the scheissenhausen and you've made their food terribly expensive? What about the kids? They go to breakfast and they've got one baked bean?
Egger: In general you'll find that in a very fat family they are low-income earners ... so those people would actually benefit from a scheme like this because the food that they buy, the energy that they use, they don't use as much energy as the rich anyway ...
Me: But what happens? Their ration of carbon credits runs out and you've made food too expensive for them to buy. What happens to them?
Egger: Again, they get money back from doing the right thing.
Me: No, but they've done the wrong thing. That's why they are fat and poor. They've done the wrong thing, they've run out of their carbon credits. What are you going to do to them then, when the food's too expensive to buy?
Egger: There are going to be personal cases like this that need to be worked out and they need to be worked out in the tax system as well as in the carbon credits system.
Egger, founder of GutBusters, undoubtedly means to do good. He has no wish to see children starve.
YET I think we have here an insight into a key failing of so many grand schemes of the Left to improve resistant humans or build for them someone else's idea of the perfect society.
These schemes so often are too perfect for the flawed humans they supposedly serve. But it's the humans who must then adapt to the system, and not the other way around. Which is where some force is required; some democracy sacrificed.
What a buzz for the closet totalitarian then, to bully other people "for their own good" - in this case, to "save the planet".
When the cause is so just, which planet-saver could let some contemptible fatty stand in their way, begging for the carbon credits to feed their chubby children?
On the other hand, which planet-saver would deny themselves any aid or comfort in this great struggle?
Need an illustration of what I'm talking about? Egger himself plans to jet off to Mexico next month to boast to a United Nations global warming conference how he persuaded Norfolk Islanders to ration just such joy flights for themselves.
This is your future coming right at you, folks. Best you realise it's no longer a joke. End of Quote
