One thing is claiming to be the victim all the time, over centuries. Another is acting in the same way, or worse, as those who are criticized for treating Jews badly. Certainly, Israel has the right to exist as a member of the international community…surely that is right but only if it behaves as such?
An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth! Is that right or not? Human rights for those who behave as human beings, is then right. Obviously it is.
Therefore, those nations, which do not behave as members of the international community, logically, should forfeit their rights to membership, just like a member of a sports club should be banned if he does not pay the fees or breaks the rules.
So why is Israel always playing the victim card, when it violates international law? If Israel accepts the notion “an eye for an eye” then it cannot complain when inevitably the type of violations it commits daily go full cycle and are visited upon Tel Aviv. Is that right or not? However, to say such is anti-Semitism (an idiotic statement, because all the term means is “anti-Semitic” as regards Semitic languages, as per Hebrew and Arabic).
The main contributor towards the hatred in the international community towards Israel is not the Jews living their lives in Moscow, London, Teheran, Addis Ababa or Jerusalem, but rather, the actions of the state of Israel. Let us not pussyfoot around here, let us have it out.
Israel tries to hide behind cowardly fences it builds for itself, namely making it a crime to question the existence of the Holocaust in many countries. Why the hysteria, why the exponential ultra-defensive posture regarding what seems to be obvious? For many of those who have visited concentration camps from the Second World War, there was never any doubt, until it became a crime to doubt.
Who is trying to cover up what? But why? Who made it a crime to speak about the African Holocaust, slavery, which was visited not upon 6 (?) million souls but probably nearer to 70 million?
The way Israel behaves these days raises serious questions as to the integrity of this “people”, if indeed Israelis can be called a single people and not a motley collection of Ethiopians, Finns, Frenchmen, Dutchmen, Americans, Palestinians and Russians, to name but a few.
While the actions of individuals are from those of the State, it is clear that Tel Aviv has a problem, a serious problem. That continuing problem places in question any continued goodwill towards the State of Israel’s right to exist, as it stands today, among many in the international community.
However, the Lord gave the promised of Israel to the Jews in 1948.
We are still living in Biblical times in that what God has said in the past must be fullfilled.
Over the years, it suffered attacks due to the abominable treatment of Palestinians (thrown out of their homes and lands as Jewish settlers started to arrive) and due to overwhelming military backing from the USA, managed to push back its original borders to areas claimed as a “Greater Israel” in Biblical texts.
By claiming the land that was promised to them by God in times gone by and then now going forth and claiming that land, in effect, they are not illegally occupying the land of the Palestinians if they were promised the land to begin with by God.
That is the case if they are occupying only land promised to them (in the first place) by God. That is not to say that if they are occupying land not given to them according to the scriptures then that occupation is illegal.
Israel is the promised land of the Jews, irrespective of if the Palestinians occupy it right now or not. It is their land and they are entitled to it. There is no one who is going to argue with God - least of all yours truly.
That is not to say that I think that the Judaism is the correct religion or that the Jews are Gods chosen people as they rejected Christ -- just as the majority are still rejecting him to this day. The land of Israel is the fulfilment of promise (by God) to the Jews to return to their homeland, and that is all it is.
That does not mean Israel still have to abide by international law even if that involves a two state solution to the current and ongoing crises in the region.
The solution to the current difficulties can only come when the Jews have occupied all of the land that was promised to them by God irrespective of whether or not that occupation is illegal in the eyes of the world or not.
It comes as no surprise that the Secretary-General of the UNO calls for an immediate halt to the illegal programme to build 1,600 new housing units in East Jerusalem. Those who know Benjamin Netanyahu as an inconsequential office boy half a century ago would not be that surprised, because Benjamin Netanyahu has never been anything more than the puppet of the gray forces controlling him.
Not only are the new settlements illegal under international law, they also violate the terms of the Roadmap for Peace.
Apart from this, the Gaza blockade against innocent civilians, including women and children, is contributing towards fuelling more anti-Israeli hatred and worse, towards the creation of criminal networks supporting an illegal economy, according to UN reports. Alternatively, is this what Israel wants?
For every day that passes, the international community feels more admiration for the resilience and courage of Gaza citizens and more and more sullen hatred for the pariah regime that builds illegal colonies and strangles the rights of civilians, including women and children.
A country built on the basis of goodwill after the horrific and barbaric treatment meted out to Jews and after the 6 (?) million milestone became accepted finally among the international community after take 2 (WW2), Israel and Israelis could have done far better in terms of managing the process with a view to implementing a two-state policy in the region.
While there is no doubt whatsoever that the Holocaust took place (not only in Germany but also in the three Baltic States, Poland, Romania and practically every other country to have joined NATO recently.
Is this a pre-requisite for membership?) and while Israel’s right to exist is unquestionable, it is also true that if Israel wishes to become a member of the international community (and a very recent member at that) then it has the obligation to respect international law.
In addition, when we speak of the Holocaust, we are referring to gypsies, Slavs and other groups considered as "sub-human" by the Nazis, including several religious groups and persons whose sexuality was expressed in ways considered deviant by the Fuhrer.
The Palestinian people are "long overdue" in their quest for an independent state, United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said on Friday, ahead of a Palestinian push for statehood in the UN planned for later this month.
That date is to be decided. Nevertheless, some are touting the 23rd, which is a Friday. Yet, there are others who have made mention of the Wednesday or even the Thursday as the final date. Therefore, at this stage it is unclear as to just what the final date will be.
Given the current evidence available, my best bet for correctly identifying the Antichrist is the head of the Euro Zone, Herman Van Rompuy. Van Rompuy is going to address the United Nations on the subject matter of a separate Palestinian state on the 22nd of this month.
As the name of this game is Bible Prophecy relative to world events, I may not be wrong here in assuming that what we are seeing unfolding on the world stage in relation to a separate Palestinian state may turn out to have a direct correlation with the treaty of Daniel Chapter 9, Verse 27.
Dan 9, 27: Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week; but in the middle of the week, He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering. And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate, even until the consummation, which is determined, is poured out on the desolate.”
That is not to say that what I am inferring is that this is necessarily going to be the aforementioned treaty (although it may be) but that the treaty is going to follow shortly afterwards. If that is to be the case, then all I can say is so much for the alleged pre-tribulation theory of the rapture. Once the treaty of Daniel is, signed one can almost kiss that goodbye as being nothing more than a fantasy.
Ban's comments came a day after Palestinian activists launched a campaign for the recognition of a Palestinian state in the United Nations. The move contradicts earlier reports that the Palestinian Authority was the one who issued the request.
In a letter addressed to Ban's Ramallah office, Palestinian activists urged the leader of the international community to "exert all possible efforts toward the achievement of the Palestinian people's just demands."
Speaking on Friday, the UN chief was quoted by the French news agency AFP as saying he fully supported Palestinian statehood: "The two state vision where Israel and Palestinians can live... side by side in peace and security -- that is a still a valid vision and I fully support it."
"In addition, I support the statehood of Palestinians; an independent, sovereign state of Palestine. It has been long overdue," Ban told reporters in Canberra, adding that a "recognition of a state is something to be determined by the member states."
Ban stressed the point further, saying, according to AFP, that it was not a decision to be made "by the Secretary General so I leave it to the member states to decide to recognize or not to recognize."
The UN chief's comments came following an Haaretz report, according to which White House Middle East emissaries Dennis Ross and David Hale met Wednesday with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and made it clear to him that a request to the United Nations for recognition in about two weeks of an independent Palestinian state could have serious implications.
For his part, Abbas said the Palestinian request for recognition of statehood within the 1967 borders had reached a point of no return and he could not retract it.
Ross and Hale also met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Ehud Barak in the course of their visit to the region, but the trip aimed at applying last-minute pressure on the Palestinian president.
An Israeli source with knowledge of the details of the meeting between the visiting Americans and Abbas noted this was the first time the Americans spelled out the full negative implications of the Palestinian request to the UN.
That is the good news. However, some quite bad news which may be right around the corner for Israel if there were ever to be a separate Palestinian agreed to, and then signed off on?
The deadlock in the Arab-Israeli negotiations is over the well-founded fear on the part of the Israeli public that the Palestinians have not given up their long-term goal of destroying the Jewish state. Until those fears will be allayed, the Israeli public will not easily agree to the creation of a sovereign Palestinian state on its borders with the power to arm itself and become a military threat.
After refusing to allay Israeli fears during the ongoing direct negotiations, the Palestinians opted to present their case for sovereignty to a U.N. audience that is not sensitive to this issue. That is not reassuring to the Israeli public.
There is paranoia within the public of Israel that goes well and truly beyond the norms of being reasonable, that may as yet be well and truly founded if those who find the following applicable verses give us any indication at all of what may just be right around the corner for Israel once the Palestinian state is created.
Zechariah 14: Behold, the day of the Lord is coming, and your spoil will be divided in your midst. For I will gather all the nations to battle against Jerusalem; the city shall be taken, the houses rifled, and the women ravished. Half of the city shall go into captivity, but the remnant of the people shall not be cut off from the city.
That is not to say that the whole world should also be now if fear of the Lord if what has been prophesied happens within a very short space of time.
Then the Lord will go forth and fight against those nations, as He fights in the day of battle. And in that day His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, which faces Jerusalem on the east.
Disclaimer: I am neither pro, nor anti - Israel and so in compiling this article there was no thought whatsoever as to the well being, or otherwise, of the Jewish state of Israel. Therefore, as that was not a consideration at all when I made this report, and that is the case, as my stance towards the Jewish state in this instance is quite irrelevant. There are those who are Born Again Christians who seem to believe that it is compulsory for those who are Christian to side on the side of Israel over all matters. However, there is nothing in the word of God that says that is to be the case at all when all that the word of God says is that Israel is God's chosen land, but not that the Jews (or Jews anywhere around the world for that matter) who inhabit Israel are Gods chosen people. On the contrary, those who inhabit Israel are for the most part Antichrists, or unsaved and as that is the case, there are only 144,000 saved at the end of it all. However, that still does not mean that those who choose to go against Gods chosen land will still not suffer the repercussions prophesied to occur against those nations who choose to do so.
Economic Terrorists Seek ‘United States of Europe’
Plan For ‘European Economic Government’ Was Brainchild Of Nazis.
European globalists are committing another act of economic terrorism by exploiting the euro debt crisis in a bid to create a “United States of Europe.”
European Council president Herman van Rompuy has announced he is ready to spearhead the group, a move that frighteningly parallels plans by top Nazis, many of whom went on to found the EU, and their mission to build a continent-wide economic government.
EU leaders are fear mongering over the consequences of member states abandoning the single currency, warning that a euro collapse would lead to martial law and even civil war.
Their “solution” is to hand themselves even more power to create a common economic policy that all member states would be forced to follow at the expense of their national sovereignty, a de facto financial government for the whole of Europe.
“European Council president Herman van Rompuy said yesterday that he was ready to run for a second term as European Union president, to lead a “United States of Europe,” reports the Irish Independent.
“Mr Van Rompuy has announced he is willing to take on the “unfinished” eurozone debt crisis with new powers setting an “economic government” in Brussels.”
Simultaneously, British Prime Minister David Cameron last night said that Britain “must let eurozone countries move towards a United States of Europe with a common economic policy,” reports the Daily Mail.
“The Prime Minister admitted he was not sure whether Germany and other countries had the political will to prevent a break-up of the single currency, but insisted they must be allowed to try – even if that meant closer integration.”
The move to exploit the debt crisis in order to completely eviscerate the economic sovereignty of every EU member by forming a central economic planning committee, a United States of Europe, to which all countries are beholden, is not merely an act of economic terrorism; it’s a chilling throwback to identical proposals that were the brainchild of top Nazis.
Plans to create a federal European economic government in the name of mandating fiscal responsibility and avoiding a repeat of the turmoil in Greece chillingly mirror blueprints concocted in the 1940’s as a means of preserving fascist power at the end of world war two by men who were responsible for founding the EU in the first place.
The European Common Market, the precursor to the European Union, was a brainchild of top Nazis in the 1940’s who wanted to preserve fascist power in the event of defeat in world war two.
US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128, also known as The Red House Report, details how top Nazis secretly met at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944.
Knowing Germany was on the brink of military defeat, conspired to create a Fourth Reich – a pan-European economic empire based around a European common market, precisely what the new Economic government proposal backed by the likes of Cameron and van Rompuy calls for.
Wealthy Nazi industrialists like Alfred Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, as well as front companies like BMW, Siemens and Volkswagen, set about the task of building a new pan-European business empire. According to historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave laborers, “For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler….The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.”
The foundations for the EU and ultimately the Euro single currency were laid by the secretive Bilderberg Group in the mid-1950’s. Bilderberg’s own leaked documents prove that the agenda to create a European common market and a single currency formulated by Bilderberg in 1955. One of the group’s principle founders was H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, a former Nazi SS officer.
However, the ideological framework for the European Union goes back even further, to the 1940’s when top Nazi economists and academics outlined the plan for a single European economic community, an agenda that was duly followed after the end of the second world war.
In his 1940 book The European Community, Nazi Economics Minister and war criminal Walther Funk wrote about the need to create a “Central European Union” and “European Economic Area” and for fixed exchange rates, stating “No nation in Europe can achieve on its own the highest level of economic freedom which is compatible with all social requirements…
The formation of very large economic areas follows a natural law of development….interstate agreements in Europe will control [economic forces generally]…There must be a readiness to subordinate one’s own interests in certain cases to those of [the EC].”
How different is Funk’s call for governments to subordinate their economic interests to those of Europe compared with Jose Manuel Barroso’s insistence that EU member states should be forced to “institute structural reforms under pain of financial sanctions”? The similarity is frightening.
Funk’s co-authors echoed his sentiments. Nazi academic Heinrich Hunke wrote, “Classic national economy..is dead…community of fate which is the European economy…fate and extent of European co-operation depends on a new unity economic plan”.
A “new unity economic plan,” this is precisely what Cameron and Van Rompuy are proposing – centralized financial control over the economies of Europe ruled by Brussels.
Fellow Nazi Gustav Koenig observed, “We have a real European Community task before us…I am convinced that this Community effort will last beyond the end of the war.”
In 1940, Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels ordered the creation of the “large-scale economic unification of Europe,” believing that “in fifty years’ time [people would] no longer think in terms of countries.” Just 53 years later, the European Union in its current form was established.
Therefore, you have one of Hitler’s most loyal Nazi allies calling for “Economic unification of Europe,” and now former German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer is demanding the establishment of “a financial oversight body with the teeth to assert control over the finances of member states.”
Even on the face of it, the fact that the EU, which began as a free trade area, is now seeking to have its unelected members directly control national economies, is completely dictatorial, authoritarian, and represents the anti-thesis of any notion of democracy or representation of the people of Europe.
Add to the fact exactly the same agenda was pursued by one of the most notoriously criminal and barbaric regimes in history, then and surely alarm bells should be ringing?
Other top Nazis who called for the creation of a pan-European federal economic superstate include Ribbentrop, Quisling and Seyss-Inquart, who spoke of “The new Europe of solidarity and co-operation among all its people… will find…rapidly increasing prosperity once national economic boundaries are removed.”
Most of the individuals who hold the reins of power in the European Union are not Nazis, indeed, they probably believe themselves to be fair-minded liberals working for the “greater good”. However, the European Union by its very nature is totalitarian, because it seeks to remove power from national governments accountable to their electorate and centralize it into the hands of supra-national entities that are accountable to nobody but himself or herself.
It also seeks to remove the right of free speech for anyone in a position of influence who criticizes this agenda.
The fact that the EU was a brainchild of top Nazi economists and industrialists, formulated as a means of preserving dictatorial power and then implemented by former Nazi working under the auspices of the Bilderberg Group in 1955, proves that the entire European Union system is poisoned with a legacy and a raison d’être of totalitarianism.
The additional knowledge that the European Union is now pursuing identical economic policies to those voiced by top Nazis, (several of whom went on to found the EU in its embryonic stages)
That in itself is a chilling reminder of how fundamentally anti-democratic and fascist the EU is becoming as it swallows up more power from member states and appoints itself as the supreme dictator of an entire continent.
The European Union will fight tooth and nail to protect the single currency from collapsing because, as top Bilderberger and Harvard professor Kenneth Rogoff made clear in a recent Financial Times piece. The plan for a globalized currency system is wholly dependent on the survival of the Euro, which almost certainly would be destroyed if the Greeks or any other member states were to default and ditch the single currency.
“The euro experiment has also brought us to a crossroads in the whole international monetary system,” wrote Rogoff. “Will our grandchildren inherit a world with a huge number of national currencies, or a very small number of multifunction currencies?”
It is beginning to grow rather tiresome for those who are true Christians, and believe the word of God inexplicably, for the continuing praise that I am seeing over the state of Israel.
There is really something, somewhere, along the line that is quite amiss if there are some Christians who have nothing else on their mind other than Israel, and its state of preparedness for the inevitable war that is soon to ensue.
There is no point at all when it says in the Holy Scriptures that there is anything at all that is ever going to befall Gods chosen nation, Israel, and so why we are seeing this continuing and ongoing fascination with Israel is really beyond belief.
Israel is mentioned, more often than not, in the Holy Scriptures as being the beautiful land.
Furthermore, the Lord is referred to as being the Lord God of Israel, so there are no natural disasters or any other serious event at all that is ever going to befall the land of Israel, not now, or not ever. In fact, if there ever a world war, or any other catastrophic event to befall the planet, Israel would be the safest place on the earth to be.
However, there is no mention anywhere in the scriptures where it says the Jews of Israel (or Jews anywhere) are the chosen ones of God, or that there is anything at all that is necessarily special about them in that sense.
On the contrary, the Jews of Israel rejected the messiah and the crucified him. Furthermore, the Jews of Israel are the ones who are going to accept the Antichrist. In other words, the Jews rejected the original messiah. Instead, they are going to accept the counterfeit - the beast of Revelation.
As that is the case, then may I lay out a challenge to anyone who reads this to show me a verse anywhere in the word of God, which says the Jews are Gods chosen people, or any other statement of such like? If I were a betting man, I would lay a wager on the fact that there would be no one who would be able to show me the existence of any verse, or any verse of a similar nature, simply because such a verse does not exist.
One thing is claiming to be the victim all the time, over centuries. Another is acting in the same way, or worse, as those who are criticized for treating Jews badly. Certainly, Israel has the right to exist as a member of the international community…surely that is right but only if it behaves as such? 
