There can be no surer certainty that we are heading head on into the end times than the introduction of the Mark of the Beast over here in Australia/worldwide. Up until now this has been so subtle that there is hardly anyone at all who has come to realize what is really going on, other than the fundamentalist Born Again Christians.Those who have been saying that the Mark was a microchip implant under the skin may have been right along simply because the word of God quite clearly says IN the right arm or forehead and not ON the right arm or forehead. It is right there in the scriptures, go ahead and read it for yourself, Revelation Chapter 13, Verses 16 to 18.
However, there is still a problem with that particular analogy that needs to be looked at. Here is the clincher, the scripture also says OR the name of the Beast, OR the number of his name in addition to the Mark. When I went to school, about 45 years ago, the word OR meant “other than”. So the word OR is an alternative. In this instance it means other than what has generally been accepted as being the Mark of the Beast, the microchip implant.
As it is being introduced in Australia right now, the alternative in this case could mean a tattoo on the skin with the number 666 embedded onto it. Reading on further in Revelation Chapter 14, we are told in no uncertain terms that anyone who takes the Mark is going to Hell. (Christians included)
However, because there is going to be an alternative in the form of the tattoo, what that means is that when the Mark is around the Christians will still be able to operate in the world economy without being forced to take the Mark, and will not have any fear of eternal damnation by taking a tattoo on the skin, as it is the Mark of the Beast that is going to send the recipient to Hell, and not the alternative, the tattoo.
The Mark of the Beast is being introduced over here in Australia via the mobile phones. Smart phones have gone one step closer to the Mark with the introduction of a nano Sim-Card which will be about the same size as the actual mark of the beast, about the size of a grain of rice. Up until now we have had a regular size, a mini size, and now the nano size Sim-card for the mobile phones. It looks very much to me like we are seeing both of the aforementioned being introduced over here are the same time. As God has quite clearly said in his word we are going to be offered an alternative to the Mark in the form of a tattoo so that we will still be able to survive in a world ruled by the Antichrist right up until the return of the Lord Jesus Christ back onto the earth.
If those who have been saying that the Mark of the Beast is a microchip implant and that a tattoo has nothing at all to do with the equation how could an implant have 666 embedded onto it and be recognizable if it was under the skin. Is there anything at all that you, the reader, would like to add to this at all? More than likely not.
WHY I AM NOT A DISPENSATIONALIST John Nelson Darby is recognized as the father of dispensationalism later made popular in the United States by Cyrus Scofield's Scofield Reference Bible. Charles Henry Mackintosh, 1820–1896, with his popular style spread Darby's teachings to humbler elements in society and may be regarded as the journalist of the Brethren Movement. CHM popularised Darby more than any other Brethren author. As there was no Christian teaching of a “rapture” before Darby began preaching about it in the 1830s, he is sometimes credited with originating the "secret rapture" theory wherein Christ will suddenly remove His bride, the Church, from this world before the judgments of the tribulation. Dispensationalist beliefs about the fate of the Jews and the re-establishment of the Kingdom of Israel put dispensationalists at the forefront of Christian Zionism, because "God is able to graft them in again," and they believe that in His grace he will do so according to their understanding of Old Testament prophecy. They believe that, while the methodologies of God may change, His purposes to bless Israel will never be forgotten, just as He has shown unmerited favour to the Church, He will do so to a remnant of Israel to fulfill all the promises made to the genetic seed of Abraham. I am not a dispensationalist; it is unbiblical.
