Thursday, December 16, 2010

The False Teachers who hide behind the charade of the normality by being called Christian

Even though I do not receive one cent of financial remuneration for the efforts that I am making here in presenting this information relative to the fulfilment of the Bible prophecies in the daily news broadcasts, I also do not expect to receive any monetary reward either.

The Lord said freely give and freely receive.

By just knowing that I have received the Lord Jesus Christ as my saviour and deliverer is, (which in turn means that I shall inherit eternal life) is more than enough gratification and reward for me.

Therefore, as a consequence of that blessed reassurance I shall continue to carry on as I am at the moment by presenting these series of articles.

I will do so in the hope that I may help others who read these articles and are not yet saved may then decide to do so by coming to a place of repentance.

These articles have been specifically designed not to frighten or scaremonger, as that is not, nor never was, my real intention.

Instead, these articles were designed to inform others of the impending doom the planet and its inhabitants now face.

That coupled with the hopeless situation the majority of those people who populate the planet now find themselves in without Christ as their saviour and deliverer.

Specifically, these articles are designed to help others to wake others up to the veracity of the Bible prophecies, and in doing so help those who have not come to a realization of just how close the world is to the very end of the church age itself.

The hope of it all is after having read these articles those that have not done so may then realize the dire straits they are in, and then repent of their sins by reciting the believers prayer of repentance that has been reformatted below on the home page of this BlogSpot.

Before I began to post these series of articles on this Google blog I was paying $30.00 every second year for domain name registration, and close on $200.00 per year for web hosting. Ever since I had started to utilize the free blog service that Google offers, all of that has now changed.

As I now have the freely given privilege of posting my thoughts and observations relative to the end times on this BlogSpot it is and never has been, nor will it ever be, an advantage that I would ever abuse in any shape or form whatsoever.

That being said there are still those who have the audacity to call themselves Christian who do not run along the same mindset as what I do.

Nevertheless to say, there are several individuals who are using this freely given advantage of the Google blogs to maliciously gossip against and slander several other groups and yet they still call themselves Christian.

That was never my intention, nor the purpose these Google blogs, as they were given out to one and all asunder to be used freely. In fact, there are some very clear guidelines that one must agree and adhere to and before taking out a Google blog. These sets of guidelines are called rules by any other name.

If there is someone out there in Cyber land who does not hold to the same principles as what you do, or if for whatever reason, you do not agree with their particular theology or doctrine that is no reason to deliberately set out to defame or slander that particular person or organization, as there are quite clearly some out there who are so fond of doing.

The idea behind the Internet initially was that it was to be used as the information highway so that certain bits and pieces of information could be presented on the Internet.

It was never ever intended to be used as a tool to viciously attack others in the manner that certain individuals who still call themselves Christians are doing at the moment.

Even though it really regrets me to have to do so, there has now come a time when I too shall have to lower myself to this same sad level by naming and shaming two particular individual(s) who are responsible for this type of behaviour. However, the only difference between my naming and shaming and his is that in this instance I shall endeavour to be as discreet as possible by using initials only, and not by directly using the individual(s) concerned full name(s).

This concerns quite a well known blog (with the initials being SM) with the administrator of that blog being quite a well so called end times evangelist (with the initials being BM) The main reason of concern though is to do with the comments that were posted onto the blog after the initial article was posted.

The article concerned that the administrator concerned had put onto his of the blog read something along these lines and was entitled: A MESSAGE FROM MIKE FRYER RE: HIS CHURCH EVICTED BECAUSE OF THEIR BELIEFS. Apparently a pastor of the aforementioned name was evicted from his church because he held certain beliefs relating to a doctrine called the Kingdom Now dogma.

The aforesaid blog administrator (BM) had put a message thankfulness from the pastor concerned, MIKE FRYER, relative to the eviction of that particular congregation after BM had expressed concern over that said same eviction.

There is nothing wrong with that you may say, and to that I would agree, except for the replies that appeared in the comments section of that article denigrating MIKE FRYER and his Kingdom Now beliefs.

You may well say, the blog administrator was not responsible for those comments as they had come from someone else. But he was still responsible for the comments because they had appeared on his blog, meaning that he had allowed those defamatory remarks to be published.

That being the case, he is just as responsible for those inflammatory comments as the person who wrote those comments is. In other words, both the blog administrator (BM) and the person who wrote the remarks for the comments section (JC of the Watchman for Jesus blog) have stabbed MIKE FRYER and his congregation in the back.

There is no point whatsoever in my repeating the comments that were made on the SM BlogSpot. On the other hand, if one has a desire to see what was written there then go to that blog and read what was said for yourselves.

To be perfectly frank, the remarks that were made there were not as bad as one may assume, but that is not the main point I am trying to make here. What concerns me more than anything else is the manner in which this whole charade was conducted, and the entirely unscrupulous manner in which BM is conducting his BlogSpot in the decidedly unchristian manner he is.

Here is my reply to those comments which I would expect would not be published on the SM BlogSpot.
I have never ever heard of this Mike Fryer fellow, let alone ever had the occasion to have met him or anyone from his group, but what concerns me more than anything else is why you and a few others are so openly attacking him and his method of fellowship in an open area forum such as what the S.M. website affords you the opportunity to do when he really has no right of reply or comeback whatsoever.

If you really do consider him to be such a menace, why not stop hiding behind your computer keyboard and go and have a face to face discussion with him just to see how far that gets you?

That suggestion applies to Mitchell as well.

If there anyone there at all from that group who were there to meet the both of you eye ball to eye ball they would be well within their rights to go within and whatever direction the Lord leads them towards.


Whatever the outcome of all of this it will be no less than what you both deserve, the pair of two faced hypocrites you are.
Then you have written to him and then out of courtesy he has replied. Then of course you choose to come forth with this five part email response. It still bothers me somewhat that you have chosen to launder your dirty linen on an open area such as what a forum area allows you to.

Small wonder he does not want to have anything to do with you ever again, I don't blame him for that one little bit.

What a joke you all both you and Mitchell are? Nonetheless, you still have the audacity to call yourselves Christian when there could be nothing at all that is farther away from Christianity than what you pair of clowns are by stirring up the pot as you both are.

Mitchell was quite clearly the one that started this, by why did you a few others choose to follow suit as the aforementioned is only trying to attract attention to himself to boost up his ratings and presence on the Internet.

He has nothing at all to pass onto his regular readers, so he comes forth with this type of misinformation just to agitate, and indeed provoke, those sad, lost and lonely people who really have nothing, or very little else, in their miserable lives other than to want to come to his blog to see what type of nonsense he has come up with, and that is what all he is all he is able to come up with - nonsense.

End times ministry, there is nothing about his so called ministry that has anything at all to do with the end times.

Why are you concerning yourself with Mike Fryer at all, and what harm is he doing to you or the other sad and dejected individuals who have made comments on the SM website other than the concerns you both feel over the Kingdom Now theology? From where I am sitting he hasn't done anything to either one of you. What a pair of losers you both are!

Who gave you the authority, and indeed the responsibility to set yourself on high and attack other groups as you are quite clearly so fond of doing? Please don't come back at me with scripture, as there is nothing at all that I can see that relates to anything you are espousing that has anything at all to do with Christianity and the Bible. Instead, your whole dogma and persona is nothing more than pure slander and gossip against other groups and religions who act a little differently than what the both of you do.

[By making this statement I am not advocating that all roads lead to heaven, such as what the World Religion lead by the Antichrist teaches. On the contrary, I still believe there is only one way to Heaven and that is through the Lord Jesus Christ, the saviour and deliverer of mankind.]

Then of course you go on to say that he does not believe in the rapture of the church, so what why do you hold something against those who do not have a system of belief in the rapture of the church?

From where I am sitting I was not aware it was compulsory to believe in the rapture. I do not believe in the Kingdom Now doctrine either, and yet I certainly do not believe in the rapture of the church, simply because there is nothing in the Bible whatsoever that says anything about a rapture.

So does that make me and all the millions of others around the world who do not believe in the rapture wrong and you right? No of course it does not, just as it does not make you right to continually set out on a pathway to harass and decimate other groups that believe little differently than what you do.

That challenge still stands to you and to anyone else out there who is able to show me one verse, yes that's right, just one verse, that says anything about a rapture of the church.

The problem I see is that there is you and so many others who have been in regular church attendance for so many years, and in doing so you have lost the ability to think for yourselves and act in a manner that is conducive to your own thought patterns. Instead, the aforementioned group have been brain washed by the pastors of those churches that have been attending regularly who have been telling them what you want to hear with doctrines that are clearly false, such as the rapture of the church.

Read what the word of God says, and not something that some pastor tells you from the preachers box. That's the trouble with the preponderance of those who call themselves Christian, they're are not reading the Bible enough.

Whatever happened to the Pentecostal Church you were going to? You had said you left that because you felt that it was being taken over by the New Age Movement, or that is was you had said. Quite frankly, I do not believe that for one little bit, and it seems that you may have left regular church attendance because of the terrible attitude you hold?

How dare you ever have the cheek to call yourself a watchman for Jesus. If this was any indicator at all as to the way Christians carried on if there are those that are as yet unsaved that happened to come across the SM website, if the remarks you had posted were any real indicator at all, those concerned would immediately be turned off and not want to have anything at all to do with Christianity.

I have said this about you and your so called ministry before - you are not doing the good works of the Lord as you think you are, but instead are doing nothing more than the works of the enemy, Satan.

Former EU leaders call for concrete measures against Israel

Twenty-six former EU leaders urged European countries to adopt a tougher stance towards Israel including taking 'concrete measures' and exacting 'consequences' over illegal settlement building.
(Ahlul Bayt News Agency) - 'It is clear that without a rapid and dramatic move … a two-state solution, which forms the one and only available option for a peaceful resolution of this conflict, will be increasingly difficult to attain,' they warned in a joint letter.

The letter has been sent to EU president Herman van Rompuy, foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton and all EU heads of government ahead of foreign ministers attending their regular General Affairs Council meeting in Brussels on Monday and Tuesday.

Signatures include Britain’s former EU commissioner Chris Patten former EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana, (pictured), former Irish president Mary Robinson and another nine former heads of state.

'Time to secure a sustainable peace is fast running out,' their joint letter warned, urging the EU, in co-operation with other international bodies, to forward a 'concrete and comprehensive proposal for the resolution of this conflict'.

It suggested that a deadline of April 2011 for progress in peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians should be set, after which the international community should intervene.

The unprecedented call comes after the US admitted failure in trying to persuade Israel to renew a moratorium on a partial freeze on illegal settlement building as a precondition for suspended talks with the Palestinians to continue.

The former EU leaders call for a clear timetable to be put together to resolve the conflict which has been going on since the creation of Israel on Palestinian land more than 60 years ago.

It also urges the EU to reiterate its position that it will not recognise any changes to the June 1967 boundaries, that a Palestinian state should be 'territory equivalent to 100% of the territory occupied in 1967', and that its capital should be East Jerusalem.

By way of sanctions, the former EU leaders warn that although the world’s largest trading bloc has always maintained that settlements are illegal, it has “not attached any consequences for continued and systematic settlement expansion.'

They also call for an end to the import of illegal settlement products 'which are, in contradiction with EU labelling recommendations, marketed as originating in Israel'.