What is Dominionism?

The Wikipedia describes Dominionism in the following manner...

Quote: In a politico-religious context, dominionism (also called subjectionism is the tendency among some conservative politically-active Christians, especially in the United States, to seek influence or control over secular civil government through political action. The goal is either a nation governed by Christians, or a nation governed by a conservative Christian understanding of biblical law. The use and application of this terminology is a matter of controversy.

Although dominionism is used in several distinct ways, most usage originates directly or indirectly from a specific passage in the King James Version of the Bible:

And God blessed [ Adam and Eve ] and God said unto them, "Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth." — Genesis Chapter 1 Verse 28 (KJV)

Christians typically interpret this verse as meaning that God gave humankind responsibility over the Earth, and theologians do not all agree on the nature and extent of that "dominion". End of Quote

Dominionism is making huge inroads into the Charismatic/Neo-Pentecostal movement in America and around the world. This movement, called "Joel's Army" is being promoted by many, including Rick Joyner, who is a member of the Catholic Knights of Malta organization, the same organization that "knighted" Rupert Murdoch. Joyner, Sarah Palin and others are teaching untold thousands about a 'new breed' that is going to take over the kingdom and give it to Jesus.

'Dominionism' IS HERASY and is the fatal foundation on which President Bush based his Iraqi and Afghan invasions -- with the full support of thousands of Christian pastors!

Simply put, we the Christians will not take over the world until the return of the Lord Jesus Christ back onto the earth. Rather than taking over the world the opposite is applicable -- the Christians will be reviled and rejected buy the world until Christ returns back onto the earth.

The land grab is on as the world prepares for famine and war

As we move fast into the end times, culminating in the soon return of The Lord Jesus Christ, the Bible warns us of earthquakes, wars- and famine. When asked by the disciples “what will be the sign of your coming, and of the end of the age?” – Matthew 24; 3, the Lord replied that wars, famines and earthquakes would be the beginning of the birth pangs, as the world was readied for His return. The contractions increase in intensity as any woman who has given birth would tell you – and this is why we are seeing a rise in the number and intensity of earthquakes. The world is positioning itself for food shortages- and war.

The world’s most powerful nations, especially cash rich countries like China, are grabbing huge slices of land and natural resources round the globe, from Canada to Africa. Forests, oil shale and farmland are all being gobbled up in the new colonialism.

I look at the food supply figures, which show that we are only a major drought or two away from world-wide famine: world food stocks are low. Water supplies are also under pressure, as vast amounts of water are not always available where people need it. Pollution of water supplies is also a big problem – and Revelation 8, telling of the trumpet judgments, shows that the world will see its seas and waterways polluted. Natural disasters of all kinds are in the wings, and the wings are flapping towards a world without faith. Those who study prophecy know that the Bible’s prophets have forecast the future in great detail and utter accuracy.

Meanwhile, clever men who don’t know prophecy but see the dangers ahead are stocking up: China has been buying raw materials of all kinds, from copper ore to precious metals. Armies are being re-equipped, as catastrophic wars lie just ahead, starting soon in the Middle East.

The report below, by one of the world’s top reporters, The Telegraph’s Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, shows how – unseen by most of the world’s media –the great resources grab is on as countries fear famine.

A popular song once had a line saying “there may be troubles ahead.” The Bible says: There WILL be troubles ahead. It’s a good time to accept the Lord, who created this world, and will shortly take His true church out of it, before the worst of the coming time of tumult.

The backlash begins against the world landgrab!

The neo-colonial rush for global farmland has gone exponential since the food scare of 2007-2008.
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

"Madagascar's land is neither for sale nor for rent," said its new president Last week's long-delayed report by the World Bank suggests that purchases in developing countries rose to 45m hectares in 2009, a ten-fold jump from levels of the last decade. Two thirds have been in Africa, where institutions offer weak defence.

As is by now well-known, sovereign wealth funds from the Mid-East, as well as state-entities from China, the Pacific Rim, and even India are trying to lock up chunks of the world's future food supply. Western agribusiness is trying to beat them to it. Western funds - many listed on London's AIM exchange - are in turn trying to beat them. The NGO GRAIN, and farmlandgrab.com, have both documented the stampede in detail.

Hedge funds that struck rich 'shorting' US sub-prime have rotated into the next great play of our era: 'long’ soil. "Productive agricultural land with water on site, will be very valuable in the future. And I've put a good amount of money into that," said Michael Burry, star of 'The Big Short'. Needless to say, this has set off a fierce backlash. Brazil has passed a decree limiting acreage held by foreign-owned companies, the latest evidence that our half-century era of globalisation may be drawing to a close. Authorities are probing whether firms are using local fronts to disguise investment in Mato Grosso and Amazonia.

"Brazilian land must stay in the hands of Brazilians," said the farm development minister, Guilherme Cassel. It is starting to feel like the early 1970s when the military regime more or less froze out foreign buyers. Where will this leave the plans of SinoLatin Capital, Goldman Sachs, Harvest Capital, or Berkshire Hathaway? Warren Buffett, wisely, is exploring his $400m venture in soya and sugar with a Brazilian partner. Argentina is drawing up its own law, pressed by the country's bishops. More than 7pc of national territory is owned by foreigners.

The Benetton brothers have 900,000 hectares of Patagonia, some on disputed Mapuche tribal land. George Soros has holdings, so does CNN's Ted Turner, and currency trader Joe Lewis, who made himself a public enemy by blocking public access to the majestic Hidden Lake. "There are many foreigners who don’t buy to produce, but rather to position themselves in places with water, mineral resources and hydrocarbons," said Pablo Orsolini, a sponsor of the legislation. In Madasgascar, a deal with Korea's Daiwoo Logistics to plant corn on territory half the size of Belgium led to the downfall of the government in 2008. The lease was revoked. "Madagascar's land is neither for sale nor for rent," said the new president.

Even Australia's senate has called for an audit of foreign-owned land and water projects. The allure of global land is obvious. The World Bank says industrial and “transition” countries are losing 2.9m hectares of cultivated farmland each year. China is paving over its fertile belt on the Eastern seabord, and depleting the water basin of the North China Plain for crop irrigation. Cheng Siwei, head of China's green energy drive, told me last week that eco-damage of 13.5pc of GDP each year outstrips China’s growth rate of 10pc. National wealth is contracting. "We have an intangible environmental debt that we are leaving to our children," he said. So does India.

Much of the globe is stealing food from the future. The World Bank said we must lift production 70pc by 2050 to meet a triad of converging demands: extra mouths; rising use of animal feed from grains as Asia moves up the affluence ladder to meat-based diets; and the biofuel drive. This will not be easy. The great leap forward in crop yields is fading. The Bank said rises in wheat and soya yields have declined from 2pc a year to zero since the 1970s in the West. Yield growth for rice and soya in emerging economies has fallen from 3pc to 1pc. "With few break-through technologies on the horizon, the scope for yield gains seems lower than in the past. Irrigation has contributed to past growth in crop yields, but water scarcity in many regions is now a major constraint," it said.

The Green Revolution is "exhausted". There is plenty of land in the former Soviet Union, where crop planting has fallen by 30m hectares since the sovkhoz collectives of the Khruschev era. Yields are still barely half Western levels on many Russian farms. Untapped hinterlands lie in Africa (Congo and Sudan) and Latin America. Developing countries are freeing up 5.5m hectares a year. There is a theoretical reservoir of 445m hectares of unforested cropland in the world, on top of the 1.5bn hectares in production.

Rich countries do not face a Malthusian crisis. They face a shift in the terms of trade between country and city, a reversal of urban dominance since the industrial revolution. We are on a thinner margin of food security, just as we are on a thinner margin of oil security. But those who live in poor countries that rely on food imports most certainly did have a Malthusian moment in 2008 when bread riots swept Egypt, Indonesia, and a string of states in Africa. Last week, 10 people died in riots in Mozambique, set off by Russia's grain export ban.

Wheat prices have doubled since June. The World Bank said the number of people who go to bed hungry each night has risen from 830m to more than 1bn over the past three years. The morality of the global land rush is finely balanced. Good projects are exactly what we need to solve the food crisis. They bring investment, know-how, and transport links. They create jobs. Peru's auction scheme on the Pacific Coast has been a success. Yet the World Bank appears deeply torn. While the report endorses the Bank's open-door globalisation agenda, the sub-text dissents on every page. "Large land acquisitions come at a high cost.

The veil of secrecy that often surrounds these deals must be lifted," it said. It warns of a "resource curse" that may enrich a small elite, leaving wreckage behind. Proposals are not properly screened. Peasants are forcibly displaced. Communal grazing lands are closed off. Some investors manipulate opinion with a media blitz of false promises. Nothing has been produced so far on almost 80pc of the land purchased. Benefits are often minimal, "even non-existent". In Africa, the land rush is diverting effort from the core task of helping small farmers raise yields.

The Bank implicitly questions whether it is wise to divert half of the world's increased output of maize and wheat over the next decade into biofuels to meet government “mandates". It will be another decade before the stalks and other inedible parts of plants can be used in bulk.

Personally, I am coming to the conclusion that the biofuel drive is misguided, given that mass solar power and throrium-based nuclear reactors – coupled with electric cars - could step into the energy breach with less destructive effects. All it takes is global leadership. As Friends of the Earth reproaches us, every time we make a frivolous journey in an over-powered car we are hurting somebody. Land is not a commodity. It has an atavistic pull in most cultures, and is semi-sacred everywhere. Absentee landlords who amass chunks of the earth – however well-intentioned - will be expropriated. Politics always prevails.

The most scary thing of all? He STILL wants to rule the world says the man Blair sent to Washington

The Head of the International Quartet of Four towards Middle East peace, Tony Blair

How many Tony Blairs are there? After hacking my way through the 691 pages of his memoirs, I now have several voices ringing in my ears.

There is the self-deprecating charmer; there is the toe-curling sexual fantasist; there is the pragmatic, calculating, often brilliant politician.

There is the matey bloke, all slang and jokey asides, the official language of the Blair Downing Street (before being sent to Washington as ambassador, I was told 'to get up the a*** of the White House and stay there').

There is the slippery dodger of difficult questions on Iraq and Afghanistan (of which more later); there is the portentous world statesman and would- be global strategist.

Chameleon: Tony Blair adopts different voices and characters to suit his circumstances and his ultimate goal is to regain the world stage

There is the messianic evangelist, taking refuge in the moral stratosphere to avoid the slings and arrows of mere mortals down on Earth; and there is the bizarre faux-confessor to having a drink or two in the evening when the going got tough.

As is often the way, in the thousands of words already written about Blair's memoir, some of the clearest insights come from abroad.

Earlier this week, a critic writing in the New York Times reminded us that Blair in his early political years was known as the man without a shadow. The critic's conclusion, after reading A Journey, was that Blair remained 'a curiously opaque figure', still without a shadow.

It is a judgment which struck an immediate chord. I recall, years ago, watching Blair being interviewed on TV by Des O'Connor in front of a studio audience. For a moment I could not work out what was odd.

Then I realised that Blair was using Essex-style glottal stops. He was tailoring his speech to what he imagined would be more acceptable to a downmarket audience.

It was the same when he used to visit the United States. He would reposition his accent somewhere over the mid-Atlantic, the better to identify with America.

Blair emerges from his book a political chameleon. His memoirs are, of course, targeted at multiple audiences, above all in Britain and America, and he has adopted different voices to appeal to each.

'Blair emerges from his book a political chameleon. His memoirs are, of course, targeted at multiple audiences, above all in Britain and America, and he has adopted different voices to appeal to each'

For the U.S. edition, he has even written a special foreword, suffused with cloying affection for America.

But - to reproduce a phrase that Blair repeatedly and redundantly uses - 'in a very real sense' the multiple voices spring more from personality than from any sales stratagem by his publishers.

This is after all a self-portrait, wholly unembellished, so we are told, by the ghost-writer's arts.

In Washington, I remember once running into Eric Anderson, Blair's former house master at his public school, Fettes. He told me that all I needed to know about Blair was that he was an accomplished actor.

But what is wrong with that? Don't all successful politicians need a little thespian blood? Churchill and Macmillan certainly had histrionic talents, which did them no harm.

Nor should we criticise Tony Blair for publishing memoirs that are selling like hot cakes and will make a ton of money. Every prime minister since 1945 has written a memoir, sometimes spanning several volumes, sometimes to great commercial success.

To the surprise of some, John Major's autobiography was a best-seller. The multi-volumes of Churchill and Macmillan have become standard reference works.

Yes, memoirs usually seek to skew history in the writer's favour and all are self-serving to some degree. But that does not necessarily destroy their value either to the contemporary reader or future historian. They are also a mouthwatering opportunity to settle scores.

On the Richter scale of political vengeance, A Journey hits a stonking 10. Blair's demolition of Brown is shocking in its brutality, to such a degree that it destroys his argument that it was better to have kept Brown as Chancellor rather than sack him.

Books to sell: Tony Blair's memoirs have seen unprecedented amounts of publicity for the former Prime Minister

Blair can therefore claim that his book falls fair and square into the mainstream of British prime ministerial tradition. Yet there is something about A Journey, which distinguishes it fundamentally-from its predecessors.

recognition that their active careers at the top of politics are over. There is none of that in Blair's book. To paraphrase Dylan Thomas, he rages against the dying light.

The point is made by his reference to Condoleezza Rice, National Security Adviser and then Secretary of State to President George W. Bush. It is worth quoting the passage in full.

'[Rice] is also a classic example of the absurdity of people with experience and capacity at the highest level not having big political jobs after retirement from office.'

For Rice, read Blair. What leaps time after time from the pages is that he still wants to be a player on the world stage. This above all is what he misses since stepping down.

It explains his decision to take a second-string job in the Middle East, promoting Palestinian economic development. It is a position from which he was able to lever himself into a seat at President Obama's dinner table earlier this week when, for the umpteenth time, peace talks between the Israelis and Palestinians were relaunched.

It explains why he wanted to be President of Europe, which could have given him a

'Others have noted that the book is tantamount to an advertisement for his current, largely money-spinning, activities'

glorious opportunity to strut his stuff on the international stage (at least we would have noticed him, unlike Herman Van Rompuy, the obscure Belgian politician who got the job).

Others have noted that the book is tantamount to an advertisement for his current, largely money-spinning, activities.

If he cannot be British prime minister, he can run Tony Blair Associates, offering advice on international matters for large fees; or providing mediation services, which draw on his experience from brokering the Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland (a genuine achievement, though, as with the memoirs of his former chief of staff, Jonathan Powell, there is more than a hint of him being seduced by the meretricious glamour of negotiating with men of violence).

Nor do I know of any prime ministerial memoir which has sought so obviously to influence the politics of the moment.

Blair wants still to be a player on the British scene. On the very eve of the election for the Labour Party leadership, Blair has made it pretty obvious that David Miliband is his choice for leader, a benediction not received with unalloyed joy by the candidate himself, who fears it could be the kiss of death. (Indeed, Blair's interference has been condemned by all the Labour candidates.)

More interestingly, at the end of his book, Blair gives his support to economic and domestic policies which are well nigh indistinguishable from those of the Tory/Lib Dem Coalition.

A job application? There are stranger things under the sun. After all, former Labour Cabinet Ministers Alan Milburn, John Hutton and Frank Field have all been co-opted into taking jobs with the Coalition.

World stage: Hillary Clinton speaks with Tony Blair as leaders gathered to speak about Middle East peace talks in Washington

But the chapters which most interested me were those which described events at which I had been present as British ambassador to the United States. These were the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the war in Afghanistan and the preparations for war in Iraq.

At this point it would be right to make a few declarations of interest. I voted for Blair in 1997. Though I was not a political appointee, Blair sent me to Washington.

I saw, and admired, Blair at the height of his powers, encapsulated in three terrific speeches: to Sinn Fein-supporting Senators and Congressmen in 1998 (which shifted the balance of argument in our direction when the Northern Ireland peace process hung in the balance); to businessmen in Chicago in 1999 (making the case for intervention in Kosovo); and at College Station, Texas, in April 2002 (when, for the first time in public, Blair extolled the virtues of regime change).

In 2005, three years after retiring, I wrote a memoir myself called D.C. Confidential, which largely recorded my time in Washington. It created a terrific fuss because of some criticisms of Blair and teasing of John Prescott and Jack Straw (to which the Cabinet Secretary raised no objection before publication).

Blair's account of these years displays plenty of sins of commission and omission. Take the Crawford summit, when in April 2002 Tony Blair stayed two nights with George and Laura Bush at their ranch in Texas.

'At this point it would be right to make a few declarations of interest. I voted for Blair in 1997. Though I was not a political appointee, Blair sent me to Washington'

During the visit, there were long periods when Blair and Bush were alone together without any advisers. For example, on the first night the No 10 and White House teams, along with Yours Truly, had dinner together at a TexMex restaurant in the nearby town of Waco.

Many years later, the Chilcot Inquiry asked me about the Crawford summit. I replied that, because I had not been at the talks, to this day I was not entirely clear what 'degree of convergence was, if you like, signed in blood at the Crawford ranch' (the reference to blood was an allusion to Blair's belief that Britain owed a 'blood debt' to the U.S. from World War II).

But I noted to the Inquiry that, in his speech the next day at College Station, Blair referred approvingly to regime change for the first time ever in my hearing in public.

In his book, Blair reacts strangely to my statement to Chilcot. He transforms my words into an assertion that he had pledged 'in blood' to support America and that he had signed up for regime change.

This, says Blair, was a myth; and I wouldn't know anyway because I was not present at the meeting - just what I had myself admitted!

Heaven knows why Blair should have misrepresented my words in this way, because his book offers little enlightenment on what actually transpired at Bush's ranch.

I suspect that my remarks to Chilcot touched a sensitive nerve, because, contrary to what he says in his memoir, his references to regime change were not, to quote Blair, 'entirely consistent with my other public pronouncements'.

In his excellent book The End Of The Party, about the last years of New Labour - an objective and fair-minded antidote to the bias of the Blair and Mandelson memoirs - the journalist Andrew Rawnsley records that Blair never satisfactorily briefed his advisers on the meeting with Bush.

No greater shadow hangs over Tony Blair's legacy than the one cast by Iraq, about which he is utterly unrepentant. It is only to be expected that he would try to rewrite history.

Special relationship: Tony Blair and George W. Bush spent long periods alone together before the Gulf War

But some things just don't wash. He says that there was no expectation of 9/11. But the Bush administration was harshly criticised for failing to heed warnings in 2001 of a great terrorist attack.

Blair takes credit for persuading Bush to go down the UN path at their meeting at Camp David in September 2002. But the decision in principle had already been taken by the President the previous month. He claims we could not have foreseen the carnage and violence that Al Qaeda and Iran would wreak in Iraq after Saddam's fall.

But what he cannot bring himself to admit is that by not focusing intensively on restoring the country's electricity supply and basic law and order from the start - by not preparing properly for the aftermath - the coalition forces created conditions ripe for Al Qaeda and the Iranians to exploit.

It is inexplicable that at their meeting in Washington at the end of January 2003, Blair appeared to agree with Bush that there was little likelihood of civil war in Iraq.

I searched his memoirs in vain for some explanation, given the warnings he had received from the Foreign Office and others. Blair never ceases to refer to the importance of a settlement between Israel and the Palestinians as an essential precursor to action against Saddam Hussein.

But as the drums of war begin to beat ever more loudly, he appears to let the matter drop - heaven forfend that it might become a real condition for our joining the U.S. in Iraq.

Blair's memoir bequeaths to us a monstrous ideological construct in which the War on Terror (a phrase apparently still alive and well in the Blair thesaurus) must be pursued to the bitter end, whatever the cost in blood and treasure, so that 'Western' values will prevail over those of militant Islam.

'It is as if the more he is criticised, the more Blair feels it necessary to cloak himself in the ideological purity of his perception of the world's future'

It is as if the more he is criticised, the more Blair feels it necessary to cloak himself in the ideological purity of his perception of the world's future.

This is a vision which is incapable of seeing that our actions in Afghanistan and Iraq have proved a recruiting sergeant for the very terrorism that threatens us, at home and abroad.

It is a vision which cannot see that in Afghanistan we are fighting a predominantly old-fashioned Pashtun insurgency, while Al Qaeda moves its operations to Somalia, Yemen and the Maghreb countries of North Africa.

Most monstrously of all, it is a vision that blames a 'sagging of the will' on the British and American people for setbacks in Afghanistan and Iraq. 'We want our battles short and successful,' says Blair disapprovingly in his memoirs.

When I read that, I did not know whether to laugh or cry. We have been fighting in Afghanistan for almost ten years, the longest sustained conflict since the Napoleonic Wars at the start of the 19th century. At least we had then a recognisable and attainable political goal.

Some years ago in Washington, the late Guardian journalist, Hugo Young, put to me the question: was Tony Blair profound or profoundly shallow?
Young was not quite sure, but tended to the latter view. If he had read A Journey, he would have hardened this judgment.

The first ever EU president Herman Van Rompuy -- a raiser of taxes!

Statement: The power base for the Antichrist is the EU.

Ever since his appointment as the first ever full time president of the EU there has been a great deal of argument amongst Bible scholars as to if there may be some probability of that appointee being the Man of Sin.

As the world now knows Herman Van Rompuy had received that appointment as from the 01st of January 2010.

However, the facts of the matter are that the world is never going to know who the Man of Sin is until he confirms a seven year covenant in the Middle East between Israel and Palestine as per the prophecies of Daniel Chapter 9 Verse 27.

And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make [it] desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate. Daniel Chapter 9, Verse 27.

I for one may have wrongly assumed that Van Rompuy may have been the Antichrist, making that suggestion due to the lack of any real scriptural evidence to prove otherwise, and based on the fact that the scriptures had proved that the power base of the Antichrist was going to be the presidency of the EU. However, I may now have discovered a Bible verse that seems to suggest otherwise. The verses I am referring to are Daniel Chapter 11 and Verses 20 to 22.

Daniel 11:20: Then shall stand up in his estate a raiser of taxes [in] the glory of the kingdom: but within few days he shall be destroyed, neither in anger, nor in battle.

Dan 11:21: And in his estate shall stand up a vile person, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries.

Dan 11:22: And with the arms of a flood shall they be overflown from before him, and shall be broken; yea, also the prince of the covenant.

Verse 20 may possibly refer to the newly appointed EU president Herman Van Rompuy as the raiser of taxes. Please click onto the attached link as clarification of that statement:

Herman Van Rompuy: Europe's first president to push for 'Euro tax'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/6622886/Herman-Van-Rompuy-Europes-first-president-to-push-for-Euro-tax.html

The glory of the kingdom in Daniel Chapter 11, Verse 20 can only refer to the Revised Roman Empire - the EU. Yet the verse says that he will last only a few days and shall be destroyed neither in anger or battle.

We know that with the Lord one day is a thousand years and a thousand years is one day and so the few days here may refer to a few months or even a few years ? Verse 21 then goes onto describe the rise of the Antichrist. We know he is the Antichrist because we are told in Verse 22 that he is the Prince of the Covenant - meaning the treaty of Dan 9/27 mentioned above.

Therefore what we may be being told in the aforementioned verses is that initially there will be a man appointed as the president of the EU (that possibly being Herman Van Rompuy as the raiser of taxes) but that his reign may only last a very short period of time, prophetically speaking, and that the one that is going to replace him will be the Antichrist; that is the Prince of the Covenant.

There is no way that I am saying that the head of the international quartet of four Tony Blair is the Prince of the Covenant (the one who designs and signs the treaty of Daniel mentioned above) or the Antichrist - BUT- just remember it was BLAIR who was initially desirous of being the first ever president of the EU but was pipped at the post by Van Rompuy. But let us just wait and see how this all eventually works out?

The Prophecies Of William Marrion Branham

William Marrion Branham

The similarities between the recent gas explosion in the US and the visions of fundamentalist William Branhman where he predicated craters covering the whole of the United States is uncanny, particularly in the light of recent revelations that there are enough of these gas pipes that crisscross the US to go around the world over one hundred times.

I am not saying by any means that this is how the fulfilment of Revelation Chapter 18, which describes the destruction of America is going to come to pass - BUT - as sure as l am sitting here typing this the enemies of the US, and there would be many, would have been able to view those images just the same as everyone else around the world has. The connotations for terrorists to use these gas pipes to wreak havoc on the US is enormous.

Accordingly are the recent gas explosions in the US the humble beginnings of what William Marrion Branham predicated all those years ago?

A Prophet?
In the Bible, God always brought His Message to the people of the world through the prophet of the age. He spoke to Moses through a burning bush and gave him the commission to lead the Hebrews out of Egypt. The visible Pillar of Fire and other signs were given to vindicate his ministry. John the Baptist brought a Message preparing the world for the coming Messiah. While baptizing the Lord Jesus in the Jordan River, a Voice from Heaven confirmed John’s Ministry, “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” Years later, the Lord’s Voice was again heard speaking to a prophet when He spoke to Paul through a blinding Light, and later gave him the commission to set the churches in order. Throughout the New and Old Testaments, God has never spoken to His people through a denominational system. He has always spoken to the people through one man: His prophet. And He vindicated these prophets through supernatural signs.

But what about today? Does God still reveal His Word to the prophets? Are there still supernatural signs? Would God send a modern-day prophet into the world? The answer is a most definite, “Yes.”
But how will we know when a prophet arises? What will he look like? How will he act? What sign will he give us? What Scriptures will he fulfil?

The prophets of old were gallant men of God, and were not afraid to stand against the religious organizations of their day. In fact, they were almost always reviled by the clergy. Elijah challenged the religious organizations of his day, asking them if God would respect their offering or his. They shouted. They prophesied. They jumped on top of the altar. They cut themselves with knives. But God did not hear them. Elijah looked up to Heaven and said, “let it be known this day that thou art God in Israel, and that I am thy servant, and that I have done all these things at thy word.” He then called fire down from Heaven to consume the offering. Micaiah the prophet withstood the King of Israel and the entire priesthood when he rebuked the High Priest Zedekiah for prophesying a lie. The High Priest struck him in the face and the King imprisoned him for speaking the truth. Even the Lord Jesus was so hated by the religious organizations of His day that they crucified Him alongside the vilest of criminals.

If there was a prophet in this modern day, how would he be accepted by the Catholic Church? The Baptist Church? The Lutheran Church? Any denomination?

The Lord Jesus commissioned all that believe Him: “And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.” (Mark 16:17-18). Is this Scripture true today? If it is not true, when did the Words of the Lord expire? Throughout the Bible, the prophets are able to heal the sick, cast out devils, and perform miracles. Moses set the brass serpent before the people of Israel to heal them from the bite of venomous snakes (Numbers 21:9). Namaan, one of the most powerful men in Syria, came to Elisha to be healed of leprosy (II Kings 5:9). When the young man fell to his death from the upper window, the prophet Paul embraced him and brought life back into the dead body (Acts 20:10). We only have record of about three years of our Lord Jesus’ life. During these few years, he continually healed the sick. The blind were made to see. Lepers were healed. The deaf received their hearing. The lame walked. Every manner of disease was healed (Matt 4:23).

The prophets of old were gallant men of God, and were not afraid to stand against the religious organizations of their day.

Even the most guarded secrets of the heart were made known to these men of God. King Nebuchadnezzar had a troubling dream, but he could not remember what it was about. The prophet Daniel told the King both the dream and the prophesy that followed (Dan 2:28). Nothing was hid from Solomon when the Queen of Sheba came before him. He was so filled with the Spirit that he told her the questions of her heart before she asked them (I Kings 10:3). Elisha told the King of Israel all the plans of the King of Syria, even to his words spoken in is bedroom (II Kings 6:12).

Through His own actions, the Lord Jesus showed that this Spirit of discernment is the Spirit of Christ. He discerned Nathanael’s nature when He said, “Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!” And he went on to tell Nathanael where he was when Phillip told him about the Messiah (John 1:49). When he saw that Jesus knew his heart, Nathanael immediately recognized Him as the Christ. The first time Jesus saw Peter, he told him the name of his father, Jona (John 1:42). Peter then forsook all and followed Jesus for the rest of his life. Jesus met the Samaritan woman at the well and told her of her past sins. Her first words were, “Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet” (John 4:18). All three of these people were from different walks of life, yet they immediately recognized Jesus when He showed the gift of discernment. Did this gift disappear when the last page of the Bible was written? If these miracles are so plainly written in the Bible, where are they today? A modern-day prophet would surely be vindicated by miracles.

Has God forgotten His people? Is He still able to heal the sick? Does He still speak to us through his prophets? Did any of the prophets foresee this day? Are there prophesies that have yet to be fulfilled?

The Promise Of A Prophet In The Last Days

The Lord told us in the book of Malachi, “Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD.”

The great and dreadful day of the Lord has yet to come, so we should sincerely look for this prophet. If the Bible is true, then this prophet will not come to the mainstream religious organizations. He will come to a select, predestinated few. Imagine if this prophet came, and he was missed. What if he is like the prophets of old, and only a handful of people recognize him? If this prophet is to return in the last day, how will we know him? The answer is plainly seen in the Scriptures. He will have the nature of a prophet. He will know the secrets of the heart. He will perform miracles. The main-stream religious organizations will attempt to discredit him. But there will be a chosen few that recognize him as the promised messenger for the day.

How will we know when Elijah returns? What characteristics will he display, so we can recognize him?

Elijah was a man of the wilderness. Great signs and wonders followed his ministry. He preached against the evils of his day. He especially preached against the immorality of Queen Jezebel. When Elijah was taken up to Heaven in a chariot of fire, his spirit fell upon Elisha. His ministry was then marked by great signs and wonders, and Elisha also preached against the sins of the world. Both prophets stood alone against the religious organizations of that day (I Kings 18:21). Hundreds of years later, the same spirit returned to the earth in John the Baptist. The prophet Malachi predicted that Elijah would return to introduce the Lord: Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me... (Malachi 3:1). John the Baptist was true to form as he called for repentance among the children of God. Like Elijah, he preached against the king and the modern religious organizations. The Lord Jesus confirmed that John the Baptist was the prophet of Malachi 3 in the book of Matthew: “For this is he, of whom it is written, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, which shall prepare thy way before thee.” Matt 11:10

Two thousand years after John the Baptist, it is again time for the spirit of Elijah to return to earth.
That day has come. In this age, we have seen the spirit of Elijah return to earth. He defied the modern denominational system. He stood against the sins of the world. He showed innumerable signs and wonders. He preached the Bible word-for-word from Genesis to Revelation. And by reading this article, you are responsible for knowing that God sent a prophet. The prophet of Malachi 4 has been among us, and he brought a Message from the Throne of the Almighty God.

That prophet’s name is William Marrion Branham.
Not since the Lord Jesus Christ walked the earth has a man affected the world in such a profound way. From a humble beginning in a one-room cabin in the hills of Kentucky, to Amarillo Texas where the Lord took him home, his life was continuously marked by supernatural events. At the direction of the Angel of the Lord in 1946, Brother Branham’s Ministry produced a spark that ignited a period of great healing revivals that swept across America and around the world. To this day, he is acknowledged by Christian historians as the “father” and “pacesetter” of the 1950s healing revival that transformed the Pentecostal Church and ultimately gave rise to the Charismatic movement, which today influences nearly every Protestant denomination. However, true to form, the denominations discount his teachings and deny his commission.

Wherever he went, God proved that Brother Branham is the prophet to this generation. Like Job, the Lord talked to him in a whirlwind. Like Moses, the Pillar of Fire was seen leading him. Like Micaiah, he was reviled by the clergy. Like Elijah, he was a man of the wilderness. Like Jeremiah, he was commissioned by an Angel. Like Daniel, he saw visions of the future. Like the Lord Jesus, he knew the secrets of the heart. And like Paul, he healed the sick.

The Lord has again visited His people through a prophet. In the darkest time in history, where morality has sunk to depths never before seen and weapons of mass destruction loom on the horizon, a humble man was sent from the presence of God to call a dying race to repentance. His legacy is not simply in books and tapes. His legacy is in the salvation of millions of souls that accepted Christ because of his Gospel.

The beloved disciple John wrote about the Lord Jesus: And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen. The same can be said about the life of Brother Branham. We have 1183 taped sermons with thousands of stories about the life of this gallant man. Yet we continuously hear new testimonies of his influence on the lives of millions of people. This article could never scratch the surface of the impact this man of God had on the world.

A self confessed Atheist tears out pages from the Korean and the Holy Bible and then smokes them.

While recording his insidious actions - can you believe that an intelligent 29 year old Australian lawyer based in Queensland has torn pages out of the Bible and Korean and then burnt them?

He then uploaded this stupid act to U Tube for the whole world to see.

Needless to say citing the shenanigans of the individual in question he has not impressed his employers. Accordingly his behaviour could have the tendency to back fire on him were and he has since been sent on leave of the more permanent variety.

The motivations of the person concerned remain questionable but one can only assume that he had performed this brainless act for no other reason other than to attract attention to himself.

Well at least in that sphere he has succeeded way beyond his wildest dreams as there are definite doubts as to his ability to ever obtain work in his chosen field again.

There may be some people of the Islamic faith that may have found his behaviour at little upsetting, but as a fundamentalist, if l am able to speak for other Christians, if his intentions were to offend Bible believing Christians he has also failed in that area to.

However what concerns me more, and a whole lot more, for this young man there is a lot more at stake here for him than simply losing his livelihood; there really are grave concerns for his spiritual well being and just where he is going to spend eternity.

He really did not know what he was doing when he set out to burn the pages of the Bible and l can only hope that the Lord is able to grant him forgiveness for his act of foolhardiness for he certainly needs forgiveness, and in bucket full's.

Accordingly, to anyone who reads this may you remember this stupid and impetuous young man in your prayers, for he certainly needs our prayers.

Here is how the world viewed the event from the Brisbane Times

Brisbane Atheist Burns Korean and Bible

A Brisbane university lawyer expects to be sacked after posting a video of himself burning the Koran and Bible online.

Queensland University of Technology employee Alex Stewart has taken leave from his non-academic position as a commercial contracts lawyer.

The university is investigating the video in which Mr Stewart appears to smoke marijuana rolled in pages from the religious texts, before rating which "burns better".

The homemade video was posted on video sharing website YouTube on Friday.

Widespread criticism of the clip led The Islamic Association of Australia this morning to call on Muslims to remain calm.

The Catholic Church, QUT and the Queensland Law Society also have condemned the clip.

The video followed international outrage at a firebrand US pastor who threatened to burn 200 Korans to mark the anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks.

Terry Jones was apparently persuaded to abandon the provocative ceremony by a promise to rethink plans to build a mosque two blocks from Ground Zero in New York.

Mr Stewart, an atheist, met QUT management this morning and agreed to take leave, a university spokeswoman said.

However, Mr Stewart fears he will not be allowed to return to the Brisbane campus.

"I'm screwed. I think I will lose my job over this. Damn it," he wrote on a website for Brisbane Atheists, of which he is an assistant organiser.

He wrote that the substance portrayed in the video was lawn clippings.

However, on the video he alluded to it being marijuana and pre-empted a police investigation.

"I probably won't appear on webcam again after the police come and arrest me," he says.

A spokeswoman this morning said police would not charge Mr Stewart.

"We haven't detected any criminal offences," the spokeswoman said.
During the 12-minute film Mr Stewart says he is performing an experiment to test whether the Islamic or Christian text is more conducive to burning.

He says people offended by the experiment are taking it "too seriously".

"It's just a f...ing book, who cares," Mr Stewart says.

"Like you can burn a flag and no one cares, people get over it so with respect to books like the Bible, the Koran, or whatever, just get over it."

EU Wants Increased Foreign Policy Role

It may be of interest to note that one of the symbols of Europe is a beast rising from the sea. The term Europe comes from the story of a woman named Europa who was seduced (some stories say raped) by the “god Zeus” who turned himself into a “gentle” beast who supposedly swept her off her feet. The 2 Euro coin used in Greece actually portray this. Here is a picture of a coin from Greece that shows just that:

The European Union is holding a major meeting on September 16, 2010 in order to expand its role in international politics:

EUOBSERVER / WEEKLY AGENDA (13 – 19 September ) – In what is to be his first major foray in the foreign policy arena, EU council president Herman Van Rompuy will on Thursday (16 September) preside over a meeting of EU leaders and foreign ministers to examine the bloc’s relations with its strategic partners.

The one-day and single-themed meeting is an attempt by an Mr Van Rompuy to ringfence where the EU’s strategic priorities lie, with the 27-nation Union more often in the news for its divisions on external issues and many larger states still content to view certain regions as having particular importance…

The summit comes as the EU is increasingly worrying about its global role. Top politicians regularly warn that the EU risks being marginalised as other more cohesive regional powers rise. (Mahony H. EU Observer, 10 September 2010. http://euobserver.com/9/30775)

The reality is that the EU not only does not want to be marginalized, it wants to set foreign policy for as much of the world as possible. Yet, it recognizes that it is not unified or strong enough to do this as much as it now wants to. This meeting is intended to remind the Europeans that major international influence is a key objective of the European Union and that it needs to take steps to make it able to fulfill that objective.

Now many recognize that the EU has its own internal squabbles. Interestingly, the lack of cohesiveness of the European Union was prophesied over 2500 years ago:

41 Whereas you saw the feet and toes, partly of potter’s clay and partly of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; yet the strength of the iron shall be in it, just as you saw the iron mixed with ceramic clay. 42 And as the toes of the feet were partly of iron and partly of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong and partly fragile. 43 As you saw iron mixed with ceramic clay, they will mingle with the seed of men; but they will not adhere to one another, just as iron does not mix with clay. (Daniel Chapter 2 Verses 41 to 43)

Because of the EU’s lack of cohesiveness, many have concluded that it never will amount to being the major world power. However, according to biblical prophecy, it will succeed despite this. Its role in international affairs and especially war will cause the world to marvel:

1 Then I stood on the sand of the sea. And I saw a beast rising up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and on his horns ten crowns, and on his heads a blasphemous name. 2 Now the beast which I saw was like a leopard, his feet were like the feet of a bear, and his mouth like the mouth of a lion. The dragon gave him his power, his throne, and great authority. 3 And I saw one of his heads as if it had been mortally wounded, and his deadly wound was healed. And all the world marveled and followed the beast. 4 So they worshiped the dragon who gave authority to the beast; and they worshiped the beast, saying, “Who is like the beast? Who is able to make war with him?” (Revelation Chapter Verses 13 and 1-4)

Many doubt that the Europeans can become a major military power, but the Bible indicates otherwise (it even indicates that the Europeans really do not think that they will use the power, but will anyways per Isaiah Chapter 10 Verses 5 to 11). Europe is currently taking steps such as its Galileo satellite system and its Large Hadron Collider (the largest physics project on earth) that will likely help it develop the military abilities that will cause the world to marvel at its future military successes.

Other steps, which I try to report here at the COGwriter news page, are also being taken within the EU to accomplish its objectives for global military (Daniel Chapter 11, Verses39 to 43; Revelation 13:1-4), religious (Revelation Chapter 13, Verses 11 to 17), and economic (cf. Revelation Chapter(s) 18; 13: Verses 16 to 17) objectives.

It is partially because of its inability to be highly unified that many do not see that the EU is rising and rapidly being set to be the Beast power warned in both the books of Daniel and Revelation. However, events such as those aimed a ecumenical unity and the September 16th meeting with Herman Van Rompuy demonstrate that steps towards some unity within the EU are happening. And according to biblical prophecy, even though there will always be some cohesiveness issues in the final European power, it still will have power for at least 3 1/2 years (Revelation Chapter 13, Verse 5).

Who is the King of the North? Is there one? Do biblical and Roman Catholic prophecies point to the same leader? Should he be followed? Who will be the King of the North discussed in Daniel 11? Is a nuclear attack prophesied to happen to the English-speaking peoples of the United States, Great Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand? When do the 1335 days, 1290 days, and 1260 days (the time, times, and half a time) of Daniel 12 begin? When does the Bible show that economic collapse will affect the United States?

Europa, the Beast, and Revelation Where did Europe get its name? What might Europe have to do with the Book of Revelation? What about “the Beast”? Is an emerging European power “the daughter of Babylon”? What is ahead for Europe?

Spain urges the EU to raise its profile in Middle East peace process - enter one Antichrist!

The Antichrist will confirm a seven year Middle East peace treaty when Satan tells him the timing is right to do so: see Daniel Chapter 9 Verse 27.

In the meantime Spain on Tuesday gave its backing to the Palestinian Authority and the creation of a Palestinian state, urging the European Union to raise its profile in the relaunched Middle East peace talks.

The Palestinian Authority "has been showing its capacity to (exercise) dialogue, flexibility and, above all, that it is seeking peace" with peaceful methods such as compromise and dialogue, Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero said after meeting his Palestinian counterpart Salam Fayyad in Madrid.

The two attended the first Spanish-Palestinian summit, which also involved several ministers from Spain and the Palestinian territories.

The summit was a signal of Spain's backing the creation of a Palestinian state, Zapatero said.

Zapatero and Fayyad agreed on the need for the EU to play a more dynamic role in the peace process. Zapatero promised to forward that message to Brussels and Washington.
Spain supports a democratic and free Palestine with a state a law and principles of equality, Zapatero said.

Fayyad described a Palestinian state as "inevitable," even if Israeli settlements represent a major obstacle for the peace process.

The peace talks should include the subjects of frontiers, Jerusalem, refugees, security, settlements and water, Spain and the Palestinian Authority said in a joint political declaration.

The dialogue should lead to the end of Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories within a year, the declaration added.

The document urged Israel to stop discrimination against Palestinians in East Jerusalem, to dismantle settlements built since March 2001 and to end any blockade of the Gaza Strip.

The Anniversary of September the 11th 2001

l have often heard the question being asked where were you when September the 11th took place? When l am asked that question my response is that l was at home at the time glued to the television watching the events unfold. l am then asked the question what was your immediate response to what l saw unfolding on the screen?

As sure as l am sitting here typing this and without a word of a lie, the first thing that l did was to call my mother and tell her that America has just been attacked and they have done it to themselves. What l meant that was that my initial reaction was that it been an inside job - and l made that statement before any of the so-called conspiracy theories began to emerge over the sad events of that day.

Then when the late and great Barry R Smith came out and wrote an article for the Omega Times entitled ""911 the Sad, Secret Truth"" that only reinforced my initial belief that what l had witnessed on that relative to 911 whilst watching it unfold on that momentous day was indeed an inside job.

The initial impressions still remain and even as America commemorates the events on this day of the anniversary of 911 l still remain as flabbergasted as ever as to why the average American cannot, or will not is more like it, see the events on that day as they really were.

The attached video may help for some to see those events in a clearer light.

Where is the man who was the president at the time of 911 George W Bush? l have seen Laura Bush on the media but no sign of the man who should have been right up there to help his fellow Americans memorialize this special event. l think that fact alone speaks volumes of the fraud the whole event is?

There is something else that has been bothering me of late while we are on the subject of 911> the building of the Mosque only a couple of blocks from where the event took place.
The American president Barak Obama does not appear to have too many qualms about that taking place which either seems to indicate that either he is a Moslem himself or the Moslems were not directly involved, one or the other?

The Burning of the Koran by Terry Jones

l do not support nor would l edify the burning of the Korean by Terry Jones, pastor of Dove World Outreach Church in Gainesville, Florida, such actions border on the lunatic fringe of Christianity - BUT - at the same time may l ask is there any book in the entire world that is worthy of being burnt to ashes other than the Koran - the answer to that is a definite NO!

The intention of the pastor is to burn large volumes of copies of the Korean on the anniversary of the September the 11th attacks on New York City - BUT - it is clear that the real purpose of the pastor in the burning of the Korean is not to protest against the September 11th attacks - but to instead use this pointless and ridiculous act as a direct protest against the building of a Mosque at the site of the September 11th attacks.

The Pastors way of thinking is that if the Moslems are going to treat us in the manner that they are by the building of the Mosque then l am going to treat them with the disdain they deserve.

Possibly, that is why he wants to hear from the Barak Obama so that if the president would agree to stop the building he would more than likely stop the burning.

I have never read, nor do l ever intend to read the Koran, so l cannot speak with any real authority as to its contents. However, what l have heard is that the Koran is nothing more than a revised and rewritten Old Testament designed by men (and not God) to convey the evil and violent religion that Islam is. Remember what it says right at the very end of the Bible ""anyone who adds to or takes away from the words of this book all of the plagues mentioned in this book will come upon them."" The words of the real God could not be clearer than this. We also need to look no further than the word of God once again and in particular the book of the Revelation to see and understand what Islam is all about and the spirit it operates under.

Revelation Chapter 9 Verses 9 to 11 refers to lslam and the violent religion that it is, while Verse 9 tells us that Moslems operate under the spirit of the bottomless pit - Apollyon.

Rev 9:7 And the shapes of the locusts [were] like unto horses prepared unto battle; and on their heads [were] as it were crowns like gold, and their faces [were] as the faces of men.
Rev 9:8 And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as [the teeth] of lions.
Rev 9:9 And they had breastplates, as it were breastplates of iron; and the sound of their wings [was] as the sound of chariots of many horses running to battle.
Rev 9:10 And they had tails like unto scorpions, and there were stings in their tails: and their power [was] to hurt men five months.
Rev 9:11 And they had a king over them, [which is] the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue [is] Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath [his] name Apollyon.

The Agenda of the Gillard Government - a New World Order

There can be no doubts at all that We/Australia as a nation is headed into deep and dangerous waters as a result of the decision of the two amigos to back the Gillard government by putting them back into power in preference to the Liberal Coalition Party.

Let us be perfectly honest the Labour government has made the biggest mess of all time over the past three years and yet these three individuals whom the media calls independents by going against the general view of public opinion by putting atheist, adulterous, feminist, Fabian Socialist '"so and so"" into power have just inflicted three years of hell onto this nation

But that's only the tip of the iceberg; take a look at what is happening overseas and the terrible disasters they have had and then believe me when I say we are heading for the same thing here but a thousand times worse as we head into the worst times in the history of the world.

Whether or not you are a Bible reader I know not, but I am, and you must believe me when I say that according to the Bible prophecies when there is a seven year treaty signed in the Middle East the game is all over, and by the looks of things that may just eventuate sooner rather than later.

The treaty will be signed by a man the Bible calls the Antichrist who will take over as the dictator for the whole globe and that is just about to happen.

But in the meantime we will have to bear the the agenda of the Gillard government - a New World Order

What is a New World Order?A New World Order is a single One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.

There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simple be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited.

The New World Order operates on the notion of problem, reaction, solution in which they stage problems that get a desired reaction from the public and are then able to implement their solution, which is nothing more than another push towards more control. By using the media they are able to make people things even if they are not true.

By conditioning people over and over with certain ideologies and messages they are able to manipulate the minds of the general public and gain control over them. Things such as patriotism and religion are regular themes portrayed through the media to cause a calculated reaction from people.

Most of the people in the media aren't a part of this group of elites or have any agenda they are trying to push. Most people are simply brainwashed employees just like everyone else trying to make a living and provide for their family. They're just the messenger giving the message.

The New World Order AgendaIn order to establish complete control over the world, there are many things that need to first take fruition.

Reduce the World Population
The New World Order plans to decrease the world population down to 500 million people. That would be a decrease of over 80% of the current world population.

Mark everyone with an RFID chip
A goal of the New World Order is to mark everyone with an RFID chip where all their personal information will be stored through this device. In order to buy groceries, own a house and participate in society you will be required to have an RFID chip. This device will be implanted somewhere in the body, most likely the hand.

Keep people dumbed downIn order to maintain control over the population it is important for the New World Order to keep the general intelligence and creative abilities of people down very low. The world operates in a very school / employee type fashion and this is on purpose.

The reality of the matter
"In one reality—Zombie Land—there you are staring into your television in a trance with your brain being filled with images of news and stories that are not real. What's real is something going on in the now while you are there. We see you playing with virtual reality with your brain impulsing the machine to create any image that stimulates your urges to possess things or have sex. As you look at the images, you get stimulated to go shopping or have sex or eat. You put your food in a microwave which vibrates its essence into matter that fits your taste receptors, and you eat it as your body settles down for a few hours. The individuals in your house as well as those you socialize with all fit the latest fashion fads—they are the perfect outgrowth of what you want to look at, yet you feel absolutely nothing about any one of them. If asked to describe their facial features, you would not be able to. You have no interaction with politics or world affairs because such things only exist only in the television. You rarely travel because you think it's dangerous, and if you do travel, you move from one isolated hotel to another into rooms with televisions that are better than the one at home because they have the sex channel. You don't have to react to or change anything or anyone. As for thinking, the computer does all that for you, since it has more left-brain neuronal capacity than any human can have. You have no way of knowing whether the data it contains describes anything real, since you do not go out and study real things and observe your own reactions. As for your soul, your desire for freedom of choice has so atrophied that you are convinced you have one lifetime, and you are in the middle of it now. Each one of your days is another opportunity to satisfy as many desires as possible while you experience absolutely no stress. You are a Zombie that will be in your body only as long as you are useful to somebody who is in control, while the expenses you incur make a profit for somebody. Who is in control? The World Management Team—powerful forces in banking, media, government, and business—who are exposed on this blog for what they are.

Troubles mount for the EU with their bid to re-draw an economic government

BRUSSELS (AFP) – Plans to radically re-draw cross-border economic government across Europe hit a stumbling block on Monday 10 days from a deadline for concrete action set by European Union leaders.

The fourth meeting of EU president Herman Van Rompuy's "task force," charged with learning the lessons of the global financial crisis and the debt chaos it left in its wake across the eurozone, ended with "too many voices, too may views," in the words of one minister, Slovakia's Ivan Miklos.

"The discussions are stuck, there's a block," admitted a European diplomat after some four hours of talks. "It can't be ruled out that with signs of economic trouble up ahead, certain governments are less inclined than before to toughen budgetary discipline."

An "in-depth discussion on national fiscal frameworks, macro-economic surveillance and sanctions," according to Van Rompuy, resulted in an order for experts to "pursue their work" enabling him to complete his "oral" report to national leaders at a summit on September 16.

However, a six-line statement made no reference to detailed ideas repeatedly raised over recent months including potential "financial sanctions" for persistently wayward eurozone countries.

Miklos' country is one of nine eastern European member states that have newly issued a demand that the costs of pension reform be written off in their deficit and debt reporting, adding a new complication to the drive to craft automatic sanctions for offenders
.
He stressed that "if we want to consider debt as part of the sanctions, this is connected," but warned that "there are a lot of open questions" which resulted in what he termed "insufficient progress."

Ministers broadly agree that the EU's Stability and Growth Pact, which restricts room for maneouvre with national finances, needs strengthened, but they appear no closer to seeing eye-to-eye on when automatic penalties should kick in.

Germany's Wolfgang Schaeuble said Europe would "have to be a little bit patient" in order to come up with "creative better rules for the preventive character of the (pact)."

On his way into the talks, he had already conceded that with each passing week it seemed that "the enthusiasm for learning the lessons is weakening bit by bit."

Sanctions ideas including penalties for poorer countries or the suspension of voting rights -- the favoured mechanism in Berlin and Paris -- "are do-able but very complex to put in motion," warned a top-level diplomat who requested anonymity.

"The first (idea) risks being seen as discrimination by Europe's poor nations because they are the biggest recipients of grants," the source added. "The second raises major legal problems with treaty change doubtless required."

Others, though, gave a more upbeat assessment, France's Christine Lagarde saying that while there were no "milestones at this stage," they had held "very good discussions" within the context of "an overall package."

Atheism, Adultery, Feminism, and Fabiasim as Labor's Julia Gillard is set to form a minority government in Australia

Labor leader to remain as Prime Minister after winning backing from two independent MPs:
Labor's Julia Gillard will form a minority government in Australia after gaining the support of two independent MPs today.

Labor won the backing of Tony Windsor and Rob Oakeshott, while Bob Katter came out for Tony Abbott, the Liberal leader who hoped to lead a conservative coalition.

This gave Gillard the support of 76 MPs, which will allow her to form a minority government and give Labor a second three-year term. Seventy-four MPs now back the opposition.

The closely contested 21 August federal elections failed to give any party a majority for the first time since 1940.

Gillard, who was born in Wales, became Australia's first female prime minister in June when Labor overthrew Kevin Rudd, who had lost the support of his party.

Last week, another independent, Andrew Wilkie came out for Labor. He had negotiated separately from the three MPs from rural areas who announced their support today. Gillard signed a deal with the Greens on climate change policy in exchange for their support.

Climate change policy has dogged Labor since Rudd was unable to get his emissions trading scheme through parliament, marking the start of his fall in popularity.

Both Labor and the Liberal/National coalition won 72 seats in the election, leaving the parliament deadlocked until today.

Gillard can now continue with her plans to introduce a 30% tax on iron ore and coal miners' burgeoning profits and make Australia's biggest polluters pay for carbon emissions.

Windsor and Oakeshott, who have both championed better communications infrastructure for rural areas, said Labor's plan to introduce a A$43bn (£25.6bn) high-speed optical fibre national broadband network was a major factor in their decision.

Abbott's Liberal party had promised a smaller, slower A$6bn network with a range of technologies including optical fibre, wireless and DSL.

"What this is is a hard decision," Oakeshott told reporters. "There's no question about that. And, on my end, it has been an absolute line-ball, points decision, judgment call; six of one, half-dozen of the other. This could not get any closer."

Windsor said he believed Gillard was more likely than Abbott to work constructively with the independents and govern for a full three-year term rather than call an early election.

During intense negotiations with the independents, both Gillard and Abbott had promised that, if they could form a minority government, they would not later call an early election in the hope of winning an outright majority.

Atheism:
In a broad sense, is the rejection of belief in the existence of deities. In a narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities. Most inclusively, atheism is simply the absence of belief that any deities exist. Atheism is contrasted with theism, which in its most general form is the belief that at least one deity exists. Julia Gillard is an Atheist - that is she does not believe in the existence of God

Adultery:
Also called philandery or infidelity, is a form of extramarital sex. It originally referred more specifically to sex between a woman who was married and a person other than her spouse but can also refer to an unmarried women having an affair with a married man. Julia Gillard has been accused of committing adultery with Craig Emerson while he was married with three children.

"Fabian socialism:
Represented the first systematic attempt to amalgamate the capitalist economic model with the thesis of Marxist collectivism, all of this, of course, under the wise and philanthropic leadership of the" elite "native speakers known as politicians." Julia Gillard is a member of the Fabian Socialists. See the article attached below

Feminism: refers to political, cultural, and economic movements seeking greater, equal, or, among a minority, superior rights and participation in society for women and girls. These rights and means of participation include legal protection and inclusion in politics, business, and scholarship, and recognition and building of women's cultures and power. Its concepts overlap with those of women's rights. Feminism is controversial for challenging traditions in many fields and especially for supporting shifting the political balance toward women. Some feminists argue that men cause and benefit from sexism; while others argue that all people are harmed by gender roles and therefore that feminism is for women and men. Feminists are persons of either sex, or females only (in which case males may be profeminists), who believe in feminism. Julia Gillard is a feminist.

Julia Gillards Agenda:
- What now for Australia?
Gillard who has painted herself to be a bit of a non-scary moderate, is red at the centre. The media distracts and woos the dumb masses with news about about her latest haircuts, etc (her gay boyfriend Mathieson is a hairdresser.) It is her aim however to re-engineer society, but years of the Left's influence in Labor governments, education and the media has already done that.

As PM, Gillard just looks like another version of Rudd. Pretending to listen to the people, she instead pushes the NWO agenda. Being a non-religious 50 year old woman in a de-facto relationship is nothing unusual in Australia anymore. Gillard simply mirrors what Australia already is, while helping to push it ever closer to extinction in the name of "tolerance."

Notable members of the Fabian Society of Australia

• Gough Whitlam (ALP Prime Minister 1972–75)
• Bob Hawke (ALP Prime Minister 1983–1991)
• Paul Keating (ALP Prime Minister 1991–1996)
• John Cain (ALP Premier of Victoria)
• Jim Cairns (ALP Deputy Prime Minister)
• Don Dunstan (ALP Premier of South Australia)
• Geoff Gallop (ALP Premier of Western Australia)
• Neville Wran (ALP Premier of NSW 1976–86)
• Frank Crean (ALP Deputy Prime Minister)
• Arthur Calwell (ALP Former Leader)
• Race Mathews (ALP MHR and Victorian MLA)
• John Faulkner (ALP Senator and National President)
• Julia Gillard (ALP Australia's first female Prime Minister)
• John Lenders (ALP Treasurer of Victoria)
• Henry Hyde Champion (Journalist)
• John Percy Jones (Businessman)
• Nettie Palmer (Writer)
• Ernest Besant-Scott (Historian)
• Lucy Morice (Feminist)
• Charles Strong (Clergyman)
• William Henry Archer (Statistician)
• Edward Shann (Economist)
• Charles Marson (Clergyman)
• David Charleston (Trade Unionist)
• John Howlett Ross (Teacher)
• Bernard O'Dowd (Writer)
• Phillip Adams (Broadcaster)

In Memoriam • Antony C. Sutton • 1925-2002

June 17, 2002, a sad day for one and all...
Eminent researcher, author

Antony Sutton — Tony — has passed on.

I received a call from his partner of many years this morning at 5:30am. Tony had gotten up early as was his custom, Marlene heard some noise, went and found Tony on the floor and called paramedics, who pronounced him dead. When Marlene called me, she was waiting for the coroner and wondering what to do. So, she called me.

Tony was an amazing fellow. A person who wouldn't "go along to get along." He was a great man whom the establishment feared because of his principled research, lack of guile and his tenacity to the truth.

I met Tony in the pages of his books. Once I discovered Tony's writings, I devoured every publication I could find. And finding his wasn't easy. Tony's books were never reviewed by the mainstream, they were conspicuously ignored. I mean, what could the powers-that-be do? Tony had their number and kept on following the trail. Tony was a private person, a recluse who didn't bask in the limelight that his underground bestseller drew.

Tony wasn't a "conspiracy" author, he was a technology researcher and journalist. Tony stumbled across some shenanigans whilst he was at the Hoover Institute studying the Soviet Union's technological capabilities and discovered that there were high "unofficial" technological exchanges and the Soviets had western technology that officially they didn't have and the fact that much of the Russian armaments used by the North Vietnamese against American boys, were built with help from the West. He kept following the trail. He wrote his explosive Wall Street series and then came the packet about Skull and Bones. He wrote a series of small books about Skull and Bones, he couldn't get them printed here, so they were printed in Australia. Finally, a Mom & Pop print shop in Montana, said "what do ya mean, nobody will publish it?" And so Liberty House Press was formed and they printed Tony's book for many years. It sold steady for many years without fanfare, but Tony had been hoping for more.

Here is an excerpt from Tony's new preface from his most recent edition of his magnum opus:
“America's Secret Establishment has had little publicity, few reviews, ignored by mainline distributors, yet has sold steadily for the past 16 years at a rate of several hundred copies a month. This activity, in turn, has generated other articles and books by other authors. But my real intent, to generate an exploration of Hegelian influence in modern America, has not been fulfilled. In great part, this can be attributed to an educational system based on a statist-Hegelian philosophy, and which has already achieved the dumbing down of America. This disastrous, destructive philosophy, the source of both Naziism and Marxism, has infected and corrupted our constitutional republic. Much of the blame for this corruption is with an elitist group of Yalie Bonesmen. Their symbol of Skull and Bones and their Hegelian philosophy, say it all, although, with typical duplicity, they would have you believe otherwise. Hegelianism glorifies the State, the vehicle for the dissemination of statist and materialist ideas and policies in education, science, politics and economics.”

So, as a tribute to Tony, please let us begin to understand the reality of our situation and the Hegelian ploys used to keep our republic in chains of ignorance, greed and imbalance.

’Tis a sad day, but we who live by our actions may change the world for our children and their children.

Now is the time for all good men and women to come to the aid of their country.

PS: Yesterday, and for a while, I have been getting "friendly" calls telling me that Skull & Bones is dangerous group and that I should watch out.

As the world looks on and waits with bated breath a new series of Middle East peace talks begins.

In the more than 40 years since the Middle East war of June 1967, there have been many peace plans and many negotiations.

However some of these past efforts at making peace have been successful, including those talks between Egypt and Israel and Israel and Jordan, but a settlement has still not been reached in the core conflict - the dispute between the Israelis and Palestinians.

Therefore because of the time frame involved and the amount of negotiations over the years at this stage of the game the average observer would be understandably sceptical that these latest rounds of talks could produce any sort of a positive outcome at all?

However from the point of view of the Fundamentalist Born Again Christian the results this time around maybe somewhat different?

When we consider the Bible prophecies and we have known for some time that the newly appointed EU president was going to confirm a seven year covenant with many in the region, and that in all probability it was going to be him who was the Antichrist, when Herman Van Rompuy was appointed as the first ever EU president as sure as night followed day we would have expected Middle East peace talks to begin - just as they are at the moment?

But will the results be any different this time around than what they have in the past and is there going to be some form of a treaty signed in the Middle East and if there is some form of treaty signed is it going to be signed by Van Rompuy thereby making him the Antichrist; only time will tell the outcome of that analogy.

Currently there are seven International Attendees meeting to discuss peace in the Middle East

1) United States President Barack Hussein Obama - 32nd Degree Prince Hall Mason,

2) Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu - Freemason

3) Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas - Freemason

4) Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak - Freemason

5) Jordanian King Abdullah II - Freemason

6) Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair - Bilderberger, Freemason, Knight of Malta and Head of the International Quartet towards Middle East peace of the U.S., the U.N., the European Union and Russia

In other words Blair represents the world powers.

However that doesn't mean by any stretch of the imagination that l mean to insinuate that Blair is the Antichrist - but as every other man at the dinner table tonight is either a President, Prime minister or a King, Blair is certainly the odd man out even though he is the head of the international Quartet of four towards peace in the Middle East.

Simply, he does not fit into any of the categories mentioned above by being a current head of state.

On the other hand, if Blair were to confirm a seven year Middle East peace treaty then there would be no doubts whatsoever that he is the Antichrist and that he is more than likely to be appointed as the second EU President and that Herman Van Rompuy is simply a fill in for the time that Blair is going to take over as the president of the EU.

However only time is going to tell the outcome of that suggested scenario?