Monday, June 4, 2012

Is the Reign of the Antichrist to be a Totalitarian Left Wing German Regime?

There is a lot of information that comes across my desk relative to the end times. Some of it is quite interesting, while there are other bits and pieces that are really far too way out there to ever be really taken seriously. Relative to that statement, someone once said to me that the numbers of the Australian dollar note add up to 6. However, even after looking there was
nothing there that I could find that could verify that statement.

Nevertheless, it is with interest that I decided to take a closer look at the Australian dollar notes sometime ago after there was considerable interest shown by some preachers about the two seals on the back of the American dollar bill.

After studying all of the bills, I did indeed note that there were certainly points of interest attached to the bills.

Bearing in mind that what I am about to present here is not new and fresh information, and in fact what I noted at that time goes back quite a number of years. What I found on the back of the Australian $20 dollar note was a Left Wing German Plane. I call it a left wing plane because as the plane was facing to the left of the bill, it meant that what we were able to see was the left hand wings of the plane. I also know that it is a German Plane because there was a German Iron Cross on the side of the plane so often favoured by the Nazis during the Second World War.

Of course, there are no doubts that others may have different and varying opinions relative to the meaning of the information that I have presented above. The facts being that there may be some who are going to say that what I have presented above has no real meaning at all, and to those I would say you may be right. On the other hand, as the purpose of this blog is to present information relative to the end times, it may be that what we are shown here is quite early glue to the final Worldwide Empire of the Antichrist as a Left Wing German Dictatorship.

In fact, the dictatorship of nations, or even the whole world, by a single brutal ruler dates back to dawn of civilization. Nevertheless, leftist ideas of dictatorship are the more modern out of the two. Hence, 99% of dictatorships in history starting from ancient Greek tyrannies till Hitler, Franco and then to numerous modern day military juntas, and lately of course Saddam Hussein, were all right wing.

Right wing tyrants use the brute force of loyal troops and police. Right dictatorships favour cult of power, nationalism and sometimes even adopt the ideologies of the Nazis.

Leftist Dictatorships, on the other hand, while often also making good use of a police state, rely on utopias of social equality (something that was quite unthinkable before the industrial era. Plato and Aristotle often imagined ideal societies, but none ever blamed slavery). As a result, in left-wing dictatorships people are sacrificing their comfort, freedom and even their very lives in the name of the magnificent dream. Therefore, in a Left Wing Dictatorship there is no reason at all to oppress anyone. If there is anyone, who dares to go against his or her ideology the result is always going to be imprisonment or execution.

In a pure theocracy, the civil leader is believed to have a direct personal connection with God. For example, a prophet like Moses led the Israelites, and the prophet Muhammad ruled the early Muslims. Law proclaimed by the ruler is also considered a divine revelation, and hence the law of God. An ecclesiocracy, on the other hand, is a situation where the religious leaders assume a leading role in the state, but do not claim that they are instruments of divine revelation. For example, the prince-bishops of the European Middle Ages, where the bishop was also the temporal ruler. The papacy in the Papal States occupied a middle ground between theocracy and ecclesiocracy, since the pope did not claim he is a prophet who receives revelation from God, but merely the (in rare cases infallible) interpreter of already-received revelation. Religiously endorsed monarchies fall between these two poles, according to the relative strengths of the religious and political organs.

FOOTNOTE:
Totalitarian regimes differ from older concepts of dictatorship or tyranny.

Totalitarian regimes seek to establish complete political, social and cultural control, whereas dictatorships seek limited, typically political, control. Two types of totalitarianism can sometimes be distinguished: Nazism and Fascism which evolved from "right-wing" extremism, and Communism, which evolved from "left-wing" extremism.

Traditionally, each is supported by different social classes. Right-wing totalitarian movements have generally drawn their popular support primarily from middle classes seeking to maintain the economic and social status quo.

Left-wing totalitarianism has often developed from working class movements seeking, in theory, to eliminate, not preserve, class distinctions. Right-wing totalitarianism has typically supported and enforced the private ownership of industrial wealth. A distinguishing feature of Communism, by contrast, is the collective ownership of such capital.

Totalitarian regimes mobilize and make use of mass political participation, and often are led by charismatic cult figures. Examples of such cult figures in modern history are Mao Tse-tung (China) and Josef Stalin (Soviet Union), who led left-wing regimes, and Adolf Hitler (Germany) and Benito Mussolini (Italy), who led right-wing regimes.

Right-wing totalitarian regimes (particularly the Nazis) have arisen in relatively advanced societies, relying on the support of traditional economic elites to attain power. In contrast, left-wing totalitarian regimes have arisen in relatively undeveloped countries through the unleashing of revolutionary violence and terror.

Such violence and terror are also the primary tools of right-wing totalitarian regimes to maintain compliance with authority.

WHY I AM NOT A DISPENSATIONALIST; John Nelson Darby is recognized as the father of dispensationalism later made popular in the United States by Cyrus Scofield's Scofield Reference Bible. Charles Henry Mackintosh, 1820–1896, with his popular style spread Darby's teachings to humbler elements in society and may be regarded as the journalist of the Brethren Movement. CHM popularised Darby more than any other Brethren author. As there was no Christian teaching of a “rapture” before Darby began preaching about it in the 1830s, he is sometimes credited with originating the "secret rapture" theory wherein Christ will suddenly remove His bride, the Church, from this world before the judgments of the tribulation. Dispensationalist beliefs about the fate of the Jews and the re-establishment of the Kingdom of Israel put dispensationalists at the forefront of Christian Zionism, because "God is able to graft them in again," and they believe that in His grace he will do so according to their understanding of Old Testament prophecy. They believe that, while the methodologies of God may change, His purposes to bless Israel will never be forgotten, just as He has shown unmerited favour to the Church, He will do so to a remnant of Israel to fulfill all the promises made to the genetic seed of Abraham. I am not a dispensationalist; it is unbiblical.

No comments: